← Library
High Court for State of TelanganaWP/5883/2015disposed of no costs

Chandana Kedarish, v. The State Of Andhra Pradesh,

2015-03-30A.Rajasheker Reddy3 pages

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT HYDERABAD FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AND THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH TUESDAY, THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF MARCH, TWO THOUSAND AND FIFTEEN :PRESENT:

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE A.RAJASHEKER REDDY WP .NO: 5883 of 2015 Between:

Chandana Kedarish, S/o. Nageswarao Rao, age 56 years, R/o.33-14-12 E, Occ: Business, Kadeyalavariveedi, Seetarampuram, Vijayawada. ..... Petitioner AND 1 The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Department of Municipal Administration and Urban Development, Secretariat, Hyderabad.

2 The Municipal Corporation Vijayaada, Rep. by its Commissioner, Vijayawada, Krishna District.

.....Respondents Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed herein, the High Court may be pleased to issue a appropriate writ, order or direction, more in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 2nd respondent in attempting to demolish 4th floor construction made over the premises bearing No.27-1/5-6, B.V. Ramayya Street, Lenin centre, Governorpeta, Vijayawada without notice u/s 452 of the Municipal Corporation Act and pending proceeding before the 1st respondent vide Rc.G2-107670/2013, dated 10.03.2013 as illegal and arbitrary. WPMP.NO: 7851 of 2015 Petition under Section 151 of C.P.C. Praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in the W.P., the High Court may be pleased to direct the 2nd respondent not to interfere and demolish 4th floor construction made over the petitioner's building bearing No.27-1/5-6, B.V. Ramayya Street, Lenin centre, Governorpeta, Vijayawada, pending disposal of WP No.5883 of 2015 on the file of the High Court.

The petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Petition and the affidavit filed herein and order of High Court dated 09-03-2015 made herein and upon hearing the arguments of Sri M.L. Ali, Advocate for the Petitioner and Sri T . Balaswamy, learned Standing Counsel for the 2nd respondent, the Court made the following ORDER:

No counter is filed by the respondents.

Status quo granted earlier stands extended for a period of one week. Post on 18-03-2015 in the motion list.

ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY//

For ASSISTANT REGISTRAR To 1 One CC to Sri M.L. Ali, Advocate (OPUC) 2 Two CCs to the G.P. for Municipal Administration (AP), High Court, Hyderabad. (OUT) 3 One spare copy.

Skm HIGH COURT ARR,J Drafted by: skm Drafted on: 17-03-2015 DATED: 17-03-2015 NOTE: Post on 18-03-2015 in the motion list.

ORDER

W.P.NO. 5883 OF 2015

EXTENSION OF STATUS QUO