← Library
High Court for State of TelanganaMACMA/1576/2006dismissed

Syed Laiquddin v. Rajender Kumar And ANR.

2019-11-06T.Amarnath Goud2 pages

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE T.AMARNATH GOUD M.A.C.M.A. No.1576 of 2006 JUDGMENT:

This appeal is filed by the appellant/claimant questioning the order passed in O.P.No.575 of 2002 dt.01-02-2006 of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal -cum- District Judge, Nizamabad (for short, the Tribunal).

2.

Brief facts of the case are that on 27-04-2002 when the claimant was going in an auto from Nizamsagar to Patancheru, at the outskirts of Muslapur (v), one lorry bearing No. HR 38/C-5917 driven by its driver with high speed in a rash and negligent manner and dashed against auto, due to which, he sustained multiple fracture injuries. Hence, he filed claim petition claiming compensation of Rs.1.00 lakh for the injuries sustained by him. 3.

In the claim petition, the 2nd respondent-insurer filed a counter denying the allegations and therefore prayed to dismiss the claim petition.

4.

After considering the oral and documentary evidence on record, the Tribunal held that the accident occurred due to the rash and negligent driving of the driver of the crime vehicle and accordingly, granted an amount of Rs.8,303/- towards compensation. Aggrieved by the same, the claimant filed this appeal. 5.

Heard and perused the material available on record.

6.

As seen from the case on hand, the claimant has not made out his case for considering enhancement of compensation since there is no evidence on record either oral or documentary in support of his claim. Further, on perusal of the impugned order passed by the Tribunal, it is clear that the Tribunal after appreciating the oral and documentary evidence came to the conclusion and rightly granted compensation. I find no illegality or irregularity in the order passed by the Tribunal and therefore the order does not warrant any interference by this Court and accordingly, the appeal is liable to be dismissed.

7.

Accordingly, the Appeal is dismissed. No costs. 8.

Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand dismissed.

________________________ T.AMARNATH GOUD, J Date: 06-11-2019 kvr