Ch. Mangeshwari Medak Dist v. State Of A.P Hyd And 4 Others
[ 325s ] HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA: AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE NINETEENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY TWO PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE N.V.SHRAVAN KUMAR WRIT PETITION NO: 6260 OF 2008 Between:
Ch. Mangeshwari, Wo.Srinivas Reddy R/o Dacharam(V) Gajwel(M) Medak Dist ...PETITIONER AND
1. State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep.by its Principal Secretary, Revenue Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad
2. The Joint Collector, Medak at Sanga reddy
3. The Mandal Revenue Officer, Siddipet Medak Dist
4. The Mandal Revenue Officer, Kondapak Medak Dist
5. Sri Ch. Krishna Reddy, S/o.Kana Reddy R/o.Dacharam(V) Gajwel (M) Medak District ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Certiorari call for the records pertaining to proceedings No.F312978/06F3/36/ROR/06 dt.31-01-2008 on the file of the 2nd respondent herein set aside the same as illegal arbitrary and beyond the scope of the powers conferred on him in so far as setting aside the order passed by the 3rd respondent in file No. Di1 763i2004 dt. 1 8-02-2006.
WPMP. NO: 8166 OF 2008 Petition under Section 15'1 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the order passed by the 2nd respondent F3i36lROR/06 dt.31-01-2008 in so far as setting aside the order passed by the 3rd respondent in File No.D/1763/2004 dl.l1-02-2006 pending disposal of the W.P. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI K.R.SASIDHARAN NAIR Counsel for Respondent Nos.1 to 4: GP FOR REVENUE Counsel for Respondent No.5: SRI PERI PRABHAKAR The Court made the following: ORDER
HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE N.V.SHRAVAN KUMAR WRIT PETITION No. 6260 OF 2008 ORDER:
Today when the matter was taken up for hearing learned counsel for the petitioner on instructions submits that the writ petitioner has already sold the property and petitioner is not interested to pursue the matter.
2. In view of the submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, this writ petition is closed. 3.
Mlscellaneous applications, if any pending, shall stand closed. No order as to cost.
SD/-N.CHANDRA SEKHAR RAO ASSISTANT, REGISTRAR -;J.
SECTION OFFICER //TRUE COPY// To,
1. One CC to SRI K.R.SASIDHARAN NAIR, Advocate IOPUC]
2. One CC to SRI PERI PRABHAKAR, Advocate [OPUC] 3.TwoCCstotheGPforRevenue,HighCourtfortheStateofTelangana louTl
4. Two C.D. CoPies.
5. One Spare CoPY.
MRC PS
HIGH COURT DATED:1910912022 -'1 'j:"* th ftffi;-
ORDER
:i'
WP.No.6260 of 2008 'l'
CLOSING THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS vio\"J0"'- ssS