Pedhi Mallaiah, R.R. Dist. v. Dist.Collector, R.R. Dist. And 2 ORS.

[ 3302 ] HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K. SARATH WRIT PETITION NOs: 9605 9607 9608 9617 9626 9630 0F 2011 WRIT PETITION NO: 9605 OF 2011 Pedhi Mallaiah, S/o. P. Kondaiah, aged about 42 years, Occ: Business, Fl/o ' 2-129111t79, Vijayapuri Colony, Uppal, Ranga Reddy District. The District Collector, Ranga Reddy District at Lakdikapool, Hyderabad The Revenue Divisional Officer, Hyderabad East Division, Ranga Reddy The Tahsildar, Hayathnagar Mandal, Ranga Reddy District .)

RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High court may be pleased to issue a writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the action of the 3rd respondent in interfering with the possession of the petitioner herein over the Plot No.'154, admeasuring 200 sq. Yards in Sy.No.283/42 situated at Abdutlahpur village, Hayathnagar Mandal, Ranga Reddy District as arbitrary,illegal,and violative of Article 14,21 and 3oo-A of Constitution of lndia.

l.A. NO: 1 OF 2011(WPMP. NO: 11884 OF 2011) Petition under section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated restrain the respondents not to interfere with the possession of the petitioner

a-'' >"

l over the Plot No.154, admeasuring 200 Sq. yards in Sy.No.2B3l42 situated at Abdullahpur village, Hayathnagar Mandal, Ranga Reddy District Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI A.KRANTI KUMAR REDDY Counsel for the Respondents: AGP FOR REVENUE WRIT PETITION NO: 9607 OF 2011 B. Dayanand Business Rl/o Hyderabad.

Singh, S/o. B. Mohan Singh, aged about 40 years, Occ: H.No. 14-10-479, Sinsi Chowraha, Neech-e Dholpet,

1. The District Collector, Ranga Reddy District at Lakdikapool, Hyderabad.

2. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Hyderabad East Division, Ranga Reddy District.

3. The Tahsildar, Hayathnagar Mandal, Ranga Reddy District. ,...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 ot the constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High court may be pleased to issue a wril, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus deciaring the action of the 3rd respondent in interfering with the possession of the petitioner herein over the plot No.g5, admeasuring 300 Sq.yards, in Sy.No.283144, situated at Abdullahpur Village, Hayathnagar Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, as arbitrary, illegal, and violative of Article 14, 21 and 300_ A of Constitutionof lndia.

l.A. NO: 1 0F 2011(WPtitP. NO: 11886 0F 2011) Petition under section 151 cPc praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in suppo( of the petition, the High court may be pleased to restrain the Respondents not to interfere with the possession of the petitioner over the plot No.95, admeasuring 300 Sq.yards, in Sy.No.2g3l44, situated at Abdullahpur Village, Hayathnagar Mandal, Ranga Reddy District. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI A.KRANTI KUMAR REDDY

a ) Counsel for the Respondents: AGp FOR REVENUE WRIT PETITIONNO: 9608 0F 2011 N.Murali Krishna Prasad Rao, S/o N.Hanumantha Rao, aoed about 34 vears. O-cc:Business, Rl/o. Flat No.103, 1st Floor, Snivi"i-nesd-enir. d;;; Vijayalaxmi Theater, Sri Ram Nagar Colony, HVaeraOjO. The District Collector, Ranga Reddy District at Lakdikapool, Hyderabad. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Hyderabad East Division, Ranga Reddy District.

TheTahsildar, Hayathnagar mandal, Ranga Reddy District. J ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of lhe constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 3rd responderit in interfering with the possession of the petitioner herein over the plot No.70lA, admeasuring 100 Sq.yards, in Sy.no.2B3l44, situated at Abdullahpur Village, Hayathnagar mandal, Ranga Reddy District, as arbitrary, illegal, and violative of Article 14,21 and3ooA of Constitution of lndia. l.A. NO: 1 OF 2011(WPMP. NO : 11889 OF 2011) Petition under section 15i cpc praying that in the circumstances stated restrain the respondents not to interfere with the possession of the petitioner over the plot NO.70lA, admeasuring .l00Sq.yards, in Sy.no.2g3l44, situated at Abdullahpur village, Hayathanagar Mandal, Ranga Reddy District. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI A.KRANTI KUMAR REDDy Counsel for the Respondents: AGp FOR REVENUE !

( -Lr WRIT PETITION NO :9617 OF 2011 Kailash Singh, S/o. Banarsi Lal, H No. 13-1-1063, Gandhi Baithak g.ged about 39 years, Occ:Business, R/o.

Upper Dhoolpet, Hyderabad.

1. The District Collector, Ranga Reddy District at Lakdikapool, Hyderabad

2. The Revenue Divisionar officer, Hyderabad East Division, Ranga Reddy

3. The Tahsildar, Hayathnagar Mandal, Ranga Reddy District .,.RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit fired therewith, the High court may be pleased to issue a writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus decraring the action of the 3rd respondent in interfering with the possession of the petitioner herein over the plot No.10i, admeasuring 200 sq. Yards in sy.No.283144 situated at Abdu[ahpur viilage, Flayathnagar Mandar, Ranga Reddy District as arbitrary, iilegar, and viorative of Articre 14,21 and 300A of Constitution of lnrlia. l.A. NO: 1 OF 2011(WPMP.

NO: 11898 0F 20 11 ) Petition under Section i 51 cpc praying that in the circumstances stated restrain the respondents not to interfere with the possession of the petitioner over the Plot No.101. admeasuring 200 sq. yards in Sy.No.2B3l44 situated at Abdullahpur village, Hayathnagar Mandal, Ranga Reddy District. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI A.KRANT| KUMAR REDDY Counsel for the Respondents: AGp FOR REVENUE WRIT PETITION NO: 9626 0F 2011 Abdul R7o 1 't-9gj9q9, Sio Abdut Lateef, aged about 34 years, Occ:Business, 21-662. nerrr Darga, Nf R NagaiHyOeianiO.

ry (- -"'-- ) t The District Collector, Ranga Reddy District at Lakdikapool, Hyderabad. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Hyderabad East Division, Ranga Reddy District.

2, TheTahsildar, Hayathnagar Mandal, Ranga Reddy District. RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 2zG of the constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 3rd respondent in interfering with the possession of the petitioner herein over the plot No.70iB, admeasuring -100 Sq.yards, in Sy.no.283/44, situated at Abdullahpur Village, Hayathnagar mandal, Ranga Reddy District, as arbitrary, illegal, and violative of ARticle 14,21 and3ooA of Constitution of lndia. l.A. NO: 1 OF 2011(WPMP.

NO: '11909 OF 2011) Petition under Section 1s1 cpc praying that in the circumstances stated restrain the respondents not to interfere with the possession of the petitioner over the plot No.70/B, admeasuring 10oSq.yards, in Sy.no.283l44, situated at Abdullahpur village, Hayathanagar Mandal, Ranga Reddy District. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI A.KRANTI KUMAR REDDY Counsel for the Respondents: AGp FOR REVENUE WRIT PETITION NO: 9630 OF 2011 plrlf"t .Singh, S/o. Banarsi Lal, aged about 42 years, Occ: Rl/o.

2. The Revenue Divisional officer, Hyderabad East Division, Rlnga Reddy

3. The Tahsildar 6Hayathnagar Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, Ranga Reddy ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stateri in the affidavit filed therewith, the High court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 3rd respondent in interfering with the possession of the petitioner herein over the plot No.94, admeasuring 300 Sq.yards, in Sy.no.283144, situated at Abduilahpur Viilage, Hayathnagar mandar, Ranga Reddy District, as arbitrary, illegal, and violative of Article 14, 21 and3ooA of Constitution of lndia. l.A. NO: 1 OF 2011(Wll MP.

NO: 11914 oF 2011) Petition under section 151 cpc praying that in the circumstances stated restrain the Respondents not to interfere with the possession of the petitioner over the plot No.94 admeasuring 300 sq.yards in sy.No.zesl44 situated at Abdullapur village, Hayathnagar Mandal, Ranga Reddy District. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI A.

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE K.SARATH WRIT PETITION Nos.96O5 9607 9608 96t7 9626 9630 of 20tt COMMON ORDER:

Heard learned counsel lor the petitioners, Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue for the respondents and perused the entire material on records. 2.

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the subject matters in these writ petitions are connected with the orders passed in W.P.Nos. 18986 of 2O 10 and batch and the same were disposed of on 05.lO.2Ol2 and requested to pass similar orders in these writ petitions as well. 3.

Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue appearing for the respondents has not disputed about the submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioners. 4.

In view of the submissions made by both sides, all the writ petitions are allowed by following the orders ,l passed by this Court in W.P.Nos. 18986 of 20l0 and batch, dated O5.lO.2Ol2, by directing the respondents not to interfere with the plots in occupation ol the writ petitioners till the lresh resumption orders to the extent of the vvrit

) petitioners ar(-. passed after putting them on notice under the provisions of the Andhra pradesh Assigned Lands (Prohibition of Transfers) Rules, 1977. No order as to costs. Misr:t'llaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed That Rule Nisi has made Absolute as above witness The Hon'ble SRI ALOK ARADHE, The Chief Justice on this Tuesday, the Thirty First Day of December, Two Thousand and Twenty Four. {t SD/-T. JAYASREE REGISTRAR ,TRUE COPY// ON OFFICER ASsrsrts SECTI To,

1. The District Collector, Ranga Reddy District at Lakdikapool, Hyderabad

2. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Hyderabad East Division, Ranga Reddy

3. The Tahsildar, Hayathnagar Mandal, Ranga Reddy District

4. One CC to SRI A.KRANTI KUMAR REDDY, Advocate [OPUC]

5. Two CCs to GP FOR REVENUE, High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad [OUT]

6. Two CD Copies BSR BS v--

ri.- HIGH COURT DATED: 31112t2024 $E SIA a c o, + ) a o 1 B FE3 2[25 l) l .\\ \1r,, D['.spa rC,dt.!) COMMON ORDER WP.Nos.9605, 9607, 9608, 9617, 9626, 9630 OF 2011 ALLOWING ALL THE WRIT PETITTONS, WITHOUT COSTS t?

l,//