← Library
High Court for State of TelanganaCRLP/4662/2022dismissed as infructuous

Songa Jyothi v. Annimalla Kondal Rao

2025-02-20E.V. Venugopal4 pages

[ 32e9 ]

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA

AT HYDERABAD THURSDAY, THE TWENTIETH DAY OF FEBRUARY .

TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE E.V. VENUGOPAL CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 4662 oF 2022 Between:

Songa Jyothi, Wo Mugada Dalaiah, aged 38 years, Occ: Contract Staff Nurse, RCH - ll, Bonakal PHC, Khammam Distiict.

.PETITIONER/ACCUSED AND

1. Annimalla Kondal Rao, S/o. Yellaiah, aged 57 years, Occ: DM and HO, R/o. H.No. 1-780/1/D, Wyra Road, Madhira, Khammah District. RESPONDENT/DE FACTO COMPLAINANT

2. State of Telangana, rep. by P.P. High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad.

...RESPONDENT Petition under Section 482 of Cr,P.C_, praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal petition, the High Court may be pleased to quash the Proceedings in C.C.No.209 of 2019 on the file of Hon'ble Judicial First Class Magistrate at Madhira.

I.A. NO: 2OF 2022'

Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P .C., praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay of all further Proceedings including appearance of the petitioner in C.C.No.209 of 2019 on the file of Hon'ble Judicial First Class Magistrate at Madhira.

This Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of Sri p PRABHAKAR REDDY, Advocate for the Petitioner and the Assistant public Prosecutor for the State of Telangana on behalf of the Respondent No.2 and of Sri J-Venudhar Reddy, Advocate for the Respondent No.1 The Court made the following: ORDER

'-------7 THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE E.V. VENUGOPAL CRTMINAL PETITION No.4662 OF 2022 ORDER:

This Criminal Petition is Iiled by the petitioner seeking to quash the proceedings against her in C.C.No-2O9 ol 2019 on the frle of the learned Judicial First Class Magistrate, at Madhira. 2.

Heard Mr.Chennaiah, learned counsel representing Mr.P.Prabhakar Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr.E.Ganesh, Iearned Assistant Public Prosecutor appearing for respondent No. 2 -State.

3.

Learned Assistant Public Prosecutor, by filing the copy of e-Courts proceedings, submits that C.C.No.2O9 of 20 19 has ended up in acquittal vide judgment dated 15.07.2024 before the learned Principal Junior Civil Judge-cum-Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Madhira and no further orders are required in this Criminal Petition. Therefore, he seeks to dismiss this Criminal Petition as infructuous.

4.

Learned counsel for the petitioner concedes to the said request.

.t

r1 Recording the submissions of both the learned counsel and taking the copy of e-courts proceedings onto the file, this Criminal Petition is dismissed as infructuous. Miscellaneous petitions, pending if any, shall stand closed. Sd/. V. KAVITHA ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER l To The Judicial First Class Magistrate, Madhira The I Additional Judicial First Class Magistrate, Khammam The Station House Officer, Madhira Police Station, Khammam District Two CCs to the Public Prosecutor, High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad (OUT) One CC to SRl. P PRABHAKAR REDDY, Advocate [OPUC] One CC to SRl. J VENUDHAR REDDY, Advocate [OPUC] Two CD Copies 5.

6.

7.

Psnr/ar A^=-

HIGH COURT DATED: 2010212025 t TE(4 o -s 'ta ,'I

ORDER

GRLP.No.4662 o12022 tx $ s ,l DISMISSING THE CRIMINAL PETITION AS INFRUCTUOUS