G. Ravi Kumar v. Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation,

[ 3166 ] HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE TWENTY NINTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.VINOD KUMAR WRIT PETITION NO: 29630 OF 2010 Between:

G. Ravi Kumar, S/o. Sastry Nil Rl/o. H.No. 16-2-740175111, VKD Nagar, Circle No. 4, Locality No. 138, Asmanghad, Hyderabad. ...'ET'T.ONER AND

1. Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation, Rep by its Dy. Commissioner, Sardar [Vlahal, Near Charminar, Hyderabad.

2. Nay Patwari, S/o. Srinivas Rao Patwari, aged 40 years, Occ: Engineer Cbnsultant, Rl/o. H.No. 1-8-714, Chikkadpally, Hyderabad ...RES'ONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to lssue an order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 1st Respondent in not taking action upon the representations submitted by the Petitioner dt. 19.4.2010 and 8.10.2010 as illegal, arbitrary, erroneous and high handed and consequently direct the 1st Respondent to take necessary action against the illegal and unauthorized constructions being carried by the 2nd Respondent by deviating from the sanctioned plan granted by the 1st Respondent itself . l.A. NO: 1OF 2010 WPMP.

NO: 37751 OF 2010 ( Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased direct the 1st Respondent to take necessary action against the 2nd Respondent by restraining him from proceeding with further illegal constructions on Plot No. 12 of Vivekavardhani Employees Cooperative Society situated at Asmangadh. Counsel for the Petitioner: M/s. A.KOKILA FOR SRI K.R.KOTESWARA RAO Counsel forthe Respondent No.1: SRI PRAVEEN KUMAR VEERJALA, SC FOR GHMC Counsel for the Respondent No.2: SRI T.V.

THE IION'BLE SRI JUSTICE T. VINOD KUMAR WRIT PETITION No.29630 of2010 ORDER:

Ms.A. Kokila, learned counsel representing Sri K.R.Koteswara Rao, Ieamed counsel for the petitioner submits that the cause in the Writ Petition has become infructuous. 2.

Recording the same, the Writ petition is closed as infructuous. No costs.

3.

As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending if any shall stand closed.

SD/. C. PRAVEEN KUMAR ASSISTANT BEGISTRAR \ ,.'

DT SECTION OFFICER To 1. One CC to SRI K.R.KOTESWARA RAO' Advogale^tO-Eqq i. 5;; 6d i; Siii pnnVeeru KU!4AE vEERJALA, sc FoR GHMC [oPUC]

5. o;; cc i; SFii i.V.nnHanrun RAo, Advocate [oPUCl

4. Two CD Copies PSK.

GJPw //TRUE COPY//

HIGH COURT DATED:2910112024 \

ORDER

ir'-) 4 7 rr-, ..,,, li:.r Lt ii ) :.'-_.:

iri \\i,- \i WP.No.29630 of 2010 ) Ij "'. J( n.

Yr-l;--'

'

\i-_:.^=,;;.- :.i',.'

CLOSING THE WRIT PETITION AS INFRUCTUOUS WITHOUT COSTS.

6 cs.,r trs-