Chitti Sridhar v. The State Of Telangana

HON'BLE Dr. JUSTICE B. SIVA SANKARA RAO CRIMINAL PETITION Nos.3555 and 3556 of 2018 COMMON ORDER :

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner in seeking cancellation of bail in both the applications and the accused persons 1 and 2 of the Crime No.154 of 2016 of Central Crime Station, Hyderabad, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 420, 406, 467, 468 and 471 read with 120-B IPC and perused the averments in the bail cancellation applications and the order of disposal of the applications for cancellation of bail passed by the learned I Additional Metropolitan Sessions Judge, Hyderabad, neither by dismissal nor by allowing and the bail order, particularly the condition of execution of self bond with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- and to attend before the Station House Officer on every Sunday at about 10.30 a.m. till further orders, from order, dated 12.07.

2017, and the disposal order of the lower Court clearly shows after the said bail order, dated 12.07.2017, the accused persons did not appear, particularly A.1 from 16.10.2017 to 30.10.2017 and A.2 from 21.08.2017 to 26.09.2017, by the disposal orders, dated 17.01.2018 in Crl.M.P.Nos.3496 and 3321 of 2107 respectively, what the learned I Additional Metropolitan Sessions Judge observed was that in all other respects A.1 and A.

Sunday at 10.30 a.m. till further orders or filing of charge sheet, whichever is earlier.

2.

Having regard to the above, as it is the duty of the Court to balance and there was already a direction and it is in compliance undisputedly, there is nothing to cancel the bail, but for to confirm the order. However, giving liberty to the petitioner/de facto complainant that if at all the accused abused the concession, fresh cancellation application can be moved.

3.

Accordingly, both the criminal petitions are dismissed. Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed in both the cases.

____________________________ Dr. B. SIVA SANKARA RAO, J 10th September 2018.

mar