M. Adinarayana Raju, Hyderabad v. Ranjan Co-Operative Housing Society, Hyderabad

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA

AT HYDERABAD THURSDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY TWO PRESENT THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE G.ANUPAMA CHAKRAVARTHY CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 1200 0F 2009 Petition under Section '1 15 of CPC against/aggrieved by the Order dated 03.'1 1.2008 in l.A.No.9 of 2006 in O.S.No.924 of 1985 on the file of the Court of the Vl Senior Civil Judge, City Civil Courts, Hyderabad. Between:

M. Adinarayana Raju, S/o Late Jogi Jagannadha Raju, aged gl Advocate, No 1-2-593122, Domalguda, Hyderabad.. es years,

...Petitioner/Petitioner/Plaintiff

AND Ranjan Co-O_perative Housing Society, TA No. 267, Rep by its Secretary Charkamal, Pattergatti, Hyderabad ...RespondenURespondenUDefendant CRPMP. NO: 1701 OF 2009 Petition under Section ',l51 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High court may be pleased to expedite the hearing of the above revision petition at an early date and pass such other and further orders as this Hon'ble court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case.

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI KOKA SATYANARAYANA RAO Counsel for the Respondent: NONE APPEARED The Court made the following: ORDER

THE HONOURABLE SMT. JUSTICE G.ANUPAMA CHAKRAVARTHY CIVIL REVISOIN PETITOIN No.1200 0F 2009 ORDER:

This Civil Revision petition is filed against Order !j I !

dated.03. l1.2008 passed in l.A.No.9 of 2006 in O.S.No.924 of t9B5 ':

on the file of Vl Senior Civil Judge, City Small Causes Court, City Civil Court, Hyderabad, whereunder the petition for condonation of delay of 30 15 days in filing the Order-lX, Rule-9 applicalion was dismissed.

2.

Today, when the matter came up for hearing it is reported by Sri Kota Satyanarayana Rao, learned Counsel for the revision petitioner that the matter has become infructuous. 3.

Accordingly, recording the statement of the learned Counsel for the Revision Petitioner, the Civil Revision petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs.

Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand closed_ 4.

I //TRUE COPY// ASSISTAN??*fli{iil To, SECTIffiCER Senior Civil Judge, cj i.l[gt$ffi*tu"*#'o;rff ;;r]il":

sv

HIGiH COURT DA]-ED: 3010612022 i:3[ ,.) B stt N1 j"

* ,.it OR]DER CRP.No.1200 of 2009 DISMISSING THE CRP AS INFRUCTUOUS L c (- ..W