M/S.Nandan Biomatrix Limited v. Herbz India And 2 ORS

HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD MONDAY ,THE ELEVENTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE M'G.PRIYADARSINI CIVIL MISCEL LANEOUS APP EAL NO: 27I OF 2012 AppealfiledUnderSection3T(1)(b)oftheArbitrationandConciliationAct, lgg6againsttheorderanddecreedated3l-03-2011inArb.o.P.No'956of2007on the file of the Court of the Chief Judge, City Civil Court at Hyderabad' Between:

M/S. Nandan Biomatrix Limited, A Company lncorporated Under The Provisions ;iih" C;p""y Act, 1956, rep bv its bi'."tto.. o/o Regd otfice 8-2-1.201112t88 ,"J ag, npirni Crest, ll itooi, ntra No.2, Baniara Hills' Hyderabad-sO0 034' Represented by its Director.

...A''ELLANT AND

1. Herbz lndia, FCC Bulidng, Mavoor Road, Kozhikoda [Calicut]' Kgl'l' ^.,,

2. Nimala Kumari, Wo.Gopinathan R/o Sudhama' SRK Nagar' Near \'llK Jn ' Ottapalem, Palakkad District, Kerala.

3. Honible Arbitrator sri M-Krishna Rao, Advocate [sole Arbitrator] R/o.H.No.16- - zi -t +u ezos, yamuna Towers, Usmangad, Malakpet, rro"tllfErroNDENTS Counsel for the Appellant: SRl. T BALA MOHAN REDDY Counsel for the Respondent No.1: SRI' K' K DURGA PRASAD Counsel for the Respondent No.2 & 3: NONE APPEARED The Court made the following: JUDGMENT

THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE M.G.PRIYADARSINI CTVIL MISCE EOUS APPEAL No.279 OF 2OL2 LLAN JUDGMENT:

When the matter has been taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the appellant submitted that this matter has become infructuous.

Recording the above submission of rearned counser for the appellant, this Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, pending Miscellaneous Applications, if any, shall stand closed.

SD/. B.S. CHIRANJEEVI JOINT REGISTRAR ,TTRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To, The Chief Judge, City Civil Court at Hyderabad (with records' if any) o;; cC b sir r gALA MoHAN REbDY Advocate [oPUC] o;; aa i" snr K K DURGA PRASAD Advocate [oPUC] Two C Copies o

HIGH COURT DATED:1111212023 oR f HC s 14 I s'

( u O

JUDGMENT

rt 0 ilAn zut r zo {tt * TCHEO * CMA.No.279 ol 2012 DISMISSING CMA AS INFRUCTUOUS WTHOUT COSTS a v