Smt. Jadala Hymavathi v. The State Of Telangana
[ 3166 ] HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY ,THE TWENTY SIXTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.VINOD KUMAR WRIT PETITION NO: 11302 OF 2024 Between:
Smt. Jadala Hymavathi, W/o. Veera Babu, Occ Housewife, Aged about 49 years, R/o. 2:1- 87512, Naim Nagar, Lashkar Singaram' Hanamkonda, Telangana ...PETITIONER AND The State of Telangana, Represented by Principal Se_cretary, Mulicipgl Administration and-Urban Development Department, Secretariat Building, Hyderabad.
1.
The Commissioner, Greater Warangal Municipal Corporation Hanamkonda District Smt. Chinthireddy Sumathi, W/o. Ram Reddy, Occ Not known, Age Not known, R/o. H. No. 6- 131 , Venkatapur, Mulugu- 506345 ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to pass an order to issue an appropriate writ, direction or order more particularly a writ of lVlandamus declaring the action of the respondent no. 2 in passing of revocation order vide Notice no. 365618/GWMC 1047512024 dated 0104- 2024, whereby the respondent no- 2 has revoked the construction permission accorded to the petitioner vide Permit No. 365606/GWMC|O473|2024 dated 0603- 2024 and the subsequent action of the Respondent No.
2 in according the permission in favor of the respondent no. 3 vide Letter No' 38'1 520/GWIVC11411l2O24 dated 21- 03- 2024 as being illegal, arbitrary and in violation of Articles 14 and 21 of the constitution of lndia and consequently to set aside the revocation order vide Notice no. 365618/GWMC 1047512024 dated 0104- 2024 passed by the respondent no.
, /,/ / ,/ revoke the permission accorded in favor of respondent No.3 vide Letter No 381520/GWIVCl111112024 dated 21- 03- 2024 lA NO: 1 OF 2024 Petition under section 151 cpc praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High court may be pleased to stay the operation of the Sanction accorded by the respondent no. 2 in favor of the respondent no. 3 vide Letter No. 381520/GW[MC 1141112024 dated 21- 03_ 2024. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI PRANAY SOHtNI Counsel for the Respondent No.1: GP FOR MCpL ADMN AND URBAN DEV Counsel for the Respondent No.2: SRI S. SURENDER REDDy, SC FOR GWMC Counsel for the Respondent No.3:--- The Court made the following: ORDER
t THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE T.VINOD KUMAR W.P.No.11302 of 2O24 ORDER:
/ After making initial submissions, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of the Court to withdraw the Writ Petition reserving liberty to the petitioner to avail remedies open to her in law.
2.
Sri S.Surender Reddy, learned Standing Counsel, appearing on behalf of respondent No.2, has no objection for the course of action being adopted by the petitioner.
3.
Granting liberty as sought for, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No order as to costs.
4.
Consequently, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed.
SD/.P.CH.NAGABHU ASSISTANT RE R SHAM ST //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To,
1. One CC to SRI PRANAY SOHINI Advocate IOPUCI 2 Two CCs to GP FOR MCPL ADMN AND URBAN DEV' High Court for the -' State of Telangana. [OUT]
3. One CC to SRI S. SURENDER REDDY' SC FOR GWMC [OPUC]
4. Two CD CoPies GBR LS av
HIGH COURT I I DATED:2 610412024 c , , o .L+ :) C,) ?
I
ORDER
\ 2t?
tIN WP.No.11302 of 2024 .,,v --;, ,''
.Z DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION AS WITHDRAWN WITHOUT COSTS %t o