← Library
High Court for State of TelanganaCRLRC/830/2018withdrawn

Vijalakshmi Sinha v. The State Of Telangana

2022-10-13G.Radha Rani3 pages

[ 321s ]

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA

AT HYDERAAAD THURSDAY ,THE THIRTEENTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY TWO PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE G.RADHA RANI CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 830 OF 2018 Criminal Revision Case under Sections 397 & 401 of CrPC against the judgement made in C.C.No. 1112016 daled.22.12.2017 on the file of the Court of the Xll Special Magistrate, Erramangil, Hyderabad. Between:

Vijalakshmi Sinha, Wo Sri B.K. Sinha, Aged about 72 years, Occ. Business,Rl/o. Flat No. 101., Raghava Residency Apartments Road No. 11., Banjara Hills., Hyderabad Rep. by her SPA holder Mr. M. Ramudu S/o M. Buchaiah, aged about 41 years, Occ: Pvt. Employment, Resident of Plot No.12, Hastinapuram, P.R.T. Colony, LB Nagar, Municipality, RR Dist - 500 079 ...REVISION PETITIONERYCOMPLAINANT AND

1. THE STATE OF TELANGANA, Rep. by its Public Prosecutor, High Court at Hyderabad

2. K.Linga Reddy S/o Late K. Narsi Reddy, Aged about 60 years Occ: Partner of Mis. Sai Sandeep lnfra Projects, Rl/o. Plot No. 11., Street No.08, V.V.Nagar., Habsiguda, Hyderabad

3. K.Shshirekha Wo K. Linga Reddy, Aged about 50 years Occ: Partnerof M/s. Sai Sandeep lnfra Projects Rt/o. Plot No. 11., Street M.08, V.V.Nagar., Habsiguda, Hyderabad

4. G.Mounitha Reddy W/o Sri. K. Sandeep Kumar Reddy, Agred about 27 years Occ: Partner of Mis. Sai Sandeep lnfra Projects Rl/o. Plot No. 11., Street No. 08, V.V.Nagar., Habsiguda, Hyderabad t ...RESPONDENTS/ACCUSED 3 TO 5 Counsel for the Petitioner : Mr. MANU Counsel for the Respondent No.'t : PUBLIC PROSECUTOR Counsel for the Respondents No.2 to 4 : Sri. M. Damodar Reddy The Court made the following: ORDER

THE IION'BLE DT.JUSTICE G.RADHA RANI CRIMINAI FI.EVISION CASE No. B3O of 2018 ORDER:

This Crinrinal Revision Case is filed to set aside the Order dated 22.12.2OL7 in CC.No.I1 of 2O16 on the Iile o{ XII Special Magistrate, Erramanzil, Hyderabad.

2. The Learnecl Counsel for petitioner submitted that the matter has become infructuous as it was settled beforc the trial Court and sought permission to withdraw.

3.

Permission is accorded and the Criminal Revision Case is dismissed as withdrawn.

1.

Miscellaneous petitions, if any pending shall stand closed SD/. A.V.S.S.C.S.M. SARMA DEPUW REGISTRAR t ll ''

/ ,TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To,

1. The Xll Special Magistrate at Erramangil, Hyderabad (with records if any)

2. Two CCs to the Public Prosecutor, High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad. [OUT]

3. One CC to Mr. MANU, Advocate [OPUC]

4. One CC to SRI M. Darnodar Reddy, Advocate [OPUC]

5. Two CD Copies

6. One Spare Copy w

HIGH COURT DATED:1 311012022 I t LA v s'

,try q * Il] O a) .1.

,i t ..'.

/.) :-

ORDER

CRLRC.No.830 c,f 2018 DISMISSING THE CRI...RC.

AS WITHDRAWN @ *, 4"