K.Padmavathi v. K.Gangannna (A-1)

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAJA ELANGO CRIMINAL REVISION CASE No.2128 OF 2012 ORDER:

The petitioner/P.W.1 has preferred the present criminal revision case by invoking the provisions under Sections 397 and 401 of Code of Criminal Procedure (Cr.P.C.,) being aggrieved by the order dated 22.06.2012 passed in S.C. No.317 of 2011 by the Principal Assistant Sessions Judge, Anantapur, whereby the learned Sessions Judge acquitted A.1 and A.2 for the offences under Section 326 IPC read with Section 34 IPC.

This Court perused the material available on record. This Court, while ordering Notice Before Admission, by order dated 02.11.2012, permitted the learned counsel for the petitioner to take personal notice on the respondents 1 and 2 and file proof of service. When the case was again listed on 17.10.2014, at request of the learned counsel for the petitioner, this Court adjourned the case. Today, i.e., 20.07.2016, when the case is called, learned counsel for the petitioner sought permission to take fresh notice on the respondents 1 and 2. Though the learned counsel for the petitioner was given sufficient time to serve notice on the respondents 1 and 2, he has not taken any steps to serve the notice and as such, this Court is of the view that the petitioner is not interested to proceed with the case and as such, the criminal revision case is liable to be dismissed.

The Criminal Revision Case is accordingly dismissed.

Consequently, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending, shall stand closed. _____________________ JUSTICE RAJA ELANGO 20.07.2016 pln