← Library
High Court for State of TelanganaWP/13506/2020allowed no costs

V. Venkateswara Rao v. The Greater Hyrderahad Municipal Corporation And 2 Others

2020-08-21Challa Kodanda Ram4 pages

HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE TWENTY FIRST DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE CHALLA KODANDA RAM WRIT PETITION NO: 13506 OF 2020 Between:

V. Venkateswara Rao, S/o. Late V.B.Raju, aged about 66 years, Occupation. Business, R/o. H. No.8-3-31811111612A, Engineers Colony, Jaya Prakash Nagar, Hyderabad. ...PETITIONER AND

1. The Greater Hyderabad lrilunicipal Corporation, Rep. by Commissioner, Tank Bund, Hyderabad

2. The Chief Crty Planner, Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation, Tank Bund, Hyderabad.

3. The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Secretary, Municipal Administration and UrbanDevelopmentDepartment,Secretariat, Hyderabad. ...RESpONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of lhe Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ of Certiorari or any other appropriate writ writ and quash the show cause notice issued by the 1st respondent in Lr. No.1/C201351612019, E-office No.236613, dated 12.08.2020 to the extent it restrains the petrtioner from making any further construction in the land admeasuring Ac.0-28 guntas in Sy.No,17BiC3 and 179141 (Forming Part of Sy No.178 and 179) of Kondapur village, Serilingampally lt4andal, Ranga Reddy District.

lA NO: 1 OF 2020 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High court may be pleased to suspend the operation and effect of the show cause notice issued by the 1st respondent in Lr.No.1/c20l1351612019, B-office No.236613, dated 12.08.2020 served on the petitioner 18.08.2020 relating to the constructions which are being made by the petitioner in the land admeasuring Ac.0-2g guntas in Sy.No.17glc3 and 17glA1 (forming Part of sy No.178 and 179) of Kondapur viilage. Seriringampaily IVandar, Ranga Reddy Dlstrict, pending disposal of the writ petition. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRl. D.B. CHAITANYA Counsel for the Respondent Nos..l & 2: SRl. SAMPATH PRABHAKAR REDDY, SC FOR GHMC Counsel for the Respondent No.3:

GP FOR MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT The Court made the following: ORDER

THE HON' BLE SRI JUSTICE CHALLA KODANDA RAM WRIT PETITION o. 13506 of 2O2O ORDER:

This Writ Petition ls filed to quash the show cause notice issued by the 1't respondent dated 12,08.2020 to the extent it restrains the petitioner from making any further construction in the land admeasuring Ac.0.2B guntas in Survey No. 178/C3 and 779/Al (forming part oF Survey Nos. 178 and 179) of Kondapur Village, Serilingampally Mandal.

The petitioner challenges the notice dated 12.08.2020 to the limited extent of directing him to stop the construction pending enquiry under Section 450 of the Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation Act, 1955.

Learned Senior Counsel Sri Vedula Venkata Ramana appearing for the petitioner submits that Section 450 of the Act does not aUthorizeorempowertheCommiSsionertosuspendthepermission pendingenqUiryaStheprovisionitse|fmakesitclearthatifbuiIdinq permission was obtained by mis-representation of facts' the same is liable to be revoked. That being so, pending enquiry' the direction of the Commissioner to stop the construction is unsustainable and his client is aggrieved only with that portion of the notice dated t2.08.2020.

Counsel for the respondent Corporation Learned Standing Reddy fairly submits that this issue was Sri SamPath Prabhakar considered bY this Court in Writ Petitions No. 8306 of 2020 and 10968 of 2020 holding that pending enquiry under Section 450 of the Act, the Commissloner is not authorized to direct stoppage of construction.

Having regard to the respective submissions' as the matter rs no longer res integra, the Writ Petition is allowed holding that the impugned notice dated 12'OB'2020 to the extent of directing the petitioner to stop construction, pending enquiry under section 450 of the Act, is unsustainable No costs'

As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions' if any shall stand closed' SD/.K.AMMA ASSISTANT REGIS R ,TRUE COPY// SECTIO OFFICER i To, 1.

The Commissioner, Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporatlon, Tank Bund, Hyderabad The Chief City Planner, Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation, Tank Bund, Hyderabad.

The Secretary, lr,4unicipal Administration and Urban Development Department, tate of Telangana, Secretariat, Hyderabad.

One CC to Sri D.B. Chaitanya Advocate [OPUC] Two CCs to the GP for lt4unicipal Administration and Urban Development, High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad. (OUT) One CC to Sri. Sampath Prabhakar Reddy, SC FOR GHMC [OPUC] Two CD Copies 2.

3.

CHR es)/

HIGH COURT DATED:21 tOBt2O2O ( fe 04 SP2m0 z 6) * * u(-c

ORDER

W.P.No.13506 of 2020 ALLOWING THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS (q\ \,/.

.\')-\'

.\\\ ".)-, \ \ .\_ '-) )A\11 4 \-