← Library
High Court for State of TelanganaWA/931/2009disposed of as infructuous

M/S.Heights Communications (India ) Pvt Ltd And 2 Others v. The Union Of India., Cabinet Secretary (Railways) And 3 Others

2022-02-21Abhinand Kumar Shavili,Satish Chandra Sharma3 pages

HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD IVONDAY,THE TWENTY FIRST DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY TWO PRESENT THE HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SATISH CHANDRA SHARMA AND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI WRIT APPEAL NO: 931 OF 2009 Writ Appeal under clause 15 of the Letters Patent filed against the order dated 30.6.2009 and made in WP.No.9938 of 2009 and pass on the file of the High Court. Between:

1. M/s. Heights Communications (lndia) PVt Ltd, Flat No. 102, Keerthi Apartments, Behind Sarathi Studios Ameerpet, Hyderabad, Rep. by its lvlanaging Director l\,4. Nageswara Rao.

2. N.4/s. Satwik Ads, 11-4-046, Flat No. 204, B. Wing, Vijaya Hills Apartments, A.C. Guards, Hyderabad Rep. by its Director N.Jagan Mohan Reddy.

3. lvlonaroy Adcom Pvt. Ltd.,, Flat No.104, 1st Floor, Jewel Residency. Opp. Andhra Bank, East Maredpally, Secunderabad, Rep. by its l\,4anaging Director, M. I\,4anohar.

...APPELLANTS/PETITIONERS AND The Union of lndia, Rep. by its Cabinet Secretary (Railways), New Delhi. The South Central Railway, Rail Nilayam, Secunderabad, Rep. by its General Manager.

3, The Chief Public Relations Officer, South Central Railway, lll Floor Rail Nilayam, Secunderabad.

4. The Senior Public Relations Officer, South Central Railway, lll FIoor Rail Nilayam, Secunderabad.

...RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS Counsel for the Appellant : SRI.K.R.PRABHAKAR Counsel for the Respondents : SRI.T.S.VENKATA RAMANA The Court made the following JUOGMENT I

TIIE HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SATISH CHANDRA SHARMA AND TIIE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI WRIT APPEAL No.931 OF 2OO9 JUDGMENT.

lPet tha Hol ble & Chi.I J us'ice salish chaadra s/i(r,nal Leamed counsel for the appellants is fair enough in informing this Court that the writ appeal has become infructuous.

The writ appeal is accordingly disposed of as infructuous. The miscellaneous applications pending, if an1,, shall stand closed. There shall be no order as to costs. SD/.CH.VENKATESWARU LU DEPUTY REqISTRAR Itv.."

,TRUE COPY'

SECTION OFFICER To

1. One CC to SRI.K.R.PRABHAKAR, Advocate [OPUC]

2. One CC to SRI.T.S.VENKATA RAMANA, Advocate IOPUC]

3. Two CD Copies

4. One spare copy SA \ SW }- \ I I

HIGH COURT D ATED:211O212O22 ,{ffrr 4--;.rgE srAr.tN t5 E|.) 7lt17 J UDGME NT WA.N0.931 of 2009 DISMISSING THE W.P AS INFRUCTUOUS WITHOUT COSTS @*6*