Fishermen Co-Operative Society, Nakrekal v. The State Of Telangana, Rep. By Its Principal Secretary,
[ 3255 ] HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE TWENTY SIXTH DAY OF SEPTEI\4BER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE N.V.SHRAVAN KUMAR WRIT PETITION NO: 25127 OF 2016 Between:
Fishermen Co-operative Society, Nakrekal, Rep. by its President Sri Boddu Katamaiah, S/o. Rama Chandraiah, Aged about 60 years, Rl/o. Nakrekal Village, Mandal, Nalgoda District.
..,,.PETITIONER AND 1 . The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Principal Secretary,, Animal Husbandry, Dairy Development and Fisheries Department, Secretariat Buildings, Hyderabad.
2. The Commissioner of Fisheries, Matsya Bhavan, Shanti Nagar, Vijayanagar Colony, Hyderabad.
3. The Commissioner for Cooperation and Registrar of Co-operative Societies, State of Telangana.
4. The Deputy Director of Fisheries, Nalgonda, Nalgonda District.
5. The Fisheries Development Officer, Nalgonda, Nalgonda District. l .....RESPONDENTS Petition Under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the order of the respondent no.4 (the Deputy Director of Fisheries, Nalgonda) vide letter no. 595iE/2015 dated 29.04.2016 and subsequent order vide letter no. 5951E12015 dated 30.06.20'16 as bad, arbitrary, contrary to the provisions of the AP Co-operative Societies Act, 1964 and Rules therein and also offends Art. 14, 19 and 21 of the Constitution lndia.
.,r l.A.NO:1 OF 2016 (WPMP.NO:31016 OF 2016) Petition Under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the order of the 4th respondent (Deputy Director of Fisheries, Nalgonda) vide letter no. 595/E/2015 dated 29.04.2016 and subsequent order vide letter no. 5951E1201 5 dated 30.06.201 6.
Counsel for the Petitioner : M/s M.VIDYAVATHI Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1, 2, 4 & 5 : GP FOR FISHERIES Counsel for the Respondent No.3 : GP FOR COOPERATION The Court made the following ORDER
,l'
HONOURABLE SR'I JUSTICE N.V.SHRAVAN KUMAR TPETlTION No. 251270F 20L6 WRI t ORDER:
Today when the matter has been taken up for hearing' learned counsel for the petitioner submits that due to efflux of time, the cause in the writ petition does not survive for further adjudication '
2. In view of the submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, this writ petition is dismissed as infructuous' \ 3.
Miscellaneous applications, if any pending, shall stand closed' No order as to costs'
SD/-A.V.S.PRASAD ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To l.TwoCCstoGPFoRF|SHER|ES,HighCourtfortheStateofTelanganaat Hyderabad. [OUT] z. rJro-cds to'cp rbn coopERATtoN, High court for the State of Telangana at Hvderabad. IOUTI 3 one'CC to IM/s-N/.VIbYAVATHl, Advocate IOPUC]
4. Two CD CoPies SA GJP ,,/
HIGH COURT DATED:26 tOgt2O24 P.E S 14 {
ORDER
o U3 0 0E[ 2024 t l WP.No.2S127 of 2016 t DEsi,r.rC.Pt'tr DISMISSING THE W.P AS INFRUCTUOUS WITHOUT COSTS.
{ q.
t I /Lu /