Noonavath Vijay , Ashok v. The State Of Telangana

HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD MONDAY, THE TWENTY EIGHTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY ONE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE JUSTICE G SRI DEVI CRL R C NO: 361 OF 2021 Criminal Revision Case Under Section 397& 401 of Criminal Revision Case against the Order dated 71412021 in Crl.lV.P.No.335 of 2O2O in Crime No.193 of 2020 Police Station, Penpahad, Nalgonda on the file of Court of I Additional District and Sessions Judge, Nalgonda .

Between:

Noonavath Vijay @ Ashok, S/o Somla, aged 26 Jalmalkunta Thanda Village of Penpahad Mandal, State years, Occ. Car Driver R/o Suryapet District, Telangana ...PETITIONER/APPALENT/ACCUSED A2 AND The State of Telangana, Represented by its Public Prosecutor High Court at Hyderabad.

.,,RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT Counsel for the Petitioner: SRl. VONJARI RAJA SHEKAR REDDY Counsel for the Respondents: PUBLIC PROSECUTOR (TG) The Court made the following: ORDER -fD

HONOURABLE JUSTICE G. SRI DEVI CRIIVINAL REVISION CASE No.36 I of 2021 ORDER:

This Criminal Revision Case is filed under Sections 397 and 401 Cr.P C. against the order, dated 07 04.2021 in Crl M.P No 335 of 2020 in Cr.No.193 of 2020 (of P.S.Penpahad) onthefileof the lAdditional District and Sessions Judge, Nalgonda.

2.

The petitioner filed Crl.M.P No.335 of 2020 seeking interim custody of Maruthi Ertiga Car bearing No.TS 29 F 7327 seized in Cr.No.193 of 2020 registered for the offence under Section 20(ii)(b) of NDPS Act, 1985. The learned Judge, vide impugned order, allowed the said petition directing to return the said car to petitioner on his furnishing Bank guarantee for Rs.3,00,000/- with certain conditions. Seeking to modify the said Bank guarantee, the petitioner filed the present revision. 3.

Learned counsel for the revision petitioner submits that due to Covid-19 situation, the petitioner is unable to furnish such Bank guarantee and thus, he prays to reduce the said Bank guarantee. 4.

ln view of the nature of offence allegedly committed by accused and as the value of car is mentioned in the affidavit as Rs.3,00,0001, the Court below has.rightly gave direction to petitioner to furnish such Bank guarantee. Hence, there are no grounds to interfere with the said order. 5.

Accordingly, the Criminal Revision Case js disnrissed. Miscellaneous applications, if any, pending shall stand dismissed SD/. CH. VENKATESWARLU DEPUTY REGISTRAR \ \/ //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To,

1. The I Additional District and Sessions Judge, Nalgonda.

2. The Station House Officer, Penpahad Police Station, Nalgonda.

3. Two CCs to Public Prosecutor, High Court for the State of Telangana, at Hyderabad [OUT]

4. One CC to Sri. Vonjari Raja Shekar Reddy, Advocate [OPUC]

5. Two CD Copies

6. One Spare Copy \.

CDL

HIGH COURT DATED: 2810612021 TA T e €'

a( t) JUt 1 2 t *, ),

ORDER

* :t * I CRLRC.No.361 ot 2021 DISMISSING THE CRL.R.C.

@#