← Library
High Court for State of TelanganaWP/9887/2018disposed of no costs

Y. Venkatramulu Naidu, v. State Of Telangana,

2018-03-27A.Rajasheker Reddy2 pages

HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE A.RAJASHEKER REDDY WRIT PETITION No.9887 of 2018 O R D E R :

It is stated by learned counsel for the petitioners that the grievance of the writ petitioners is pending by way of representations before the respondents, but as the same are not being disposed of present writ petition is filed. Heard Sri D.Balakishan Rao, learned Standing Counsel for the 2nd respondent.

In view of the facts and circumstances of the case, there shall be direction to the respondents to consider the representations of the petitioners dated 20.03.2018, 22.03.2018, 12.03.2018, 15.03.2018, 20.03.2018, and 13.03.2018 in terms of judgment in WP.No.26845 of 2017 and Batch, dated 30-11-2017 and take action, accordingly, within a period of three weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of. No order as to costs.

As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this writ petition, shall stand closed. _____________________________ A.RAJASHEKER REDDY, J 27.03.2018

tk