Md.Maqdoom Mohiuddin v. The State Of Telangana

HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE A.RAJASHEKER REDDY W.P.No.24449 of 2017 ORDER:

The case of the petitioner is that he was issued notice under Section 452 of Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation Act (for short "the Act"), dated 29-04-2017 and he filed explanation on 30-06-2017.

Without considering the explanation of the petitioner, the respondents are trying to demolish the subject property. Aggrieved by the same, the present writ petition is filed.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner.

Learned Standing Counsel for respondents 2 and 3 on instructions submit that no orders are passed. In view of the facts and circumstances of the case, the 3rd respondent is directed to consider the explanation of the petitioner dated 30-06-2017 said to have been filed by the petitioner and thereafter take action in accordance with law after considering the explanation of the petitioner. Till such decision is taken, there shall be stay of demolition of subject property. It goes without saying that the petitioner shall not carry out any further constructions in contravention of the Act. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of. As a sequel to the disposal of the writ petition, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed.

_________________________ A.RAJASHEKER REDDY,J 25-07-2017 Nvl