G. Madhu Sudhana Rao, Kukrnool Dist. v. P.P., Hyd

[ 32se ]

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA

AT HYDERABAD l THURSDAY,THE SECOND DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE E.V. VENUGOPAL CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 14824 OF 2014 Between:

G. MADHU SUDHANA RAO, S/o Podda Chanchaiah, R:/o Door No. 28-936, Opp. Govt. Hospital Hotel Abhiruchi, Noonepalli Nandyal, KURNOOL District .PETITIONER/ACCUSED AND The State of Telangana Rep. by its Spl. Prosecutor for ACB, High Court at Hyderabad ...RESPON DE NT/COM PLAINANT Petition under Section 437143814391482 of Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to call for the records pertaining to C.C-l.Io. 675 of 2011 on the file of Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Hyderabad for offence U/s. 340 of lPC, consequently quash the same.

l.A NO: 1 OF 2014(CRLPMP. NO: 15684 OF 2014) Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition,the High Court may be pleased to Stay all further proceedings in C.C.No. .675 of 2011on the file of Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Hyderabad for offence U/s. 340of 1PC pending disposal of the above Criminal Petition.

This Petition @ming on for hearing,upon perusing the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of Sri PILLIX LAW FIRM, Advocate for the Petitioner and Sri Vizarath Ali, Asst. Public Prosecutor on behalf of the Respondent.

The Court made the following: ORDER

HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE E.V.VENUGoPAL CRIMINAL PETITION No. 14824 OF 2014 ORDER:

I This Criminal Petition is filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. I seeking to call for the records pertaining to C.C.No.675 of 2Ol1 on the file of Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Hyderabad for the offence under Section 340 IPC and quash the same. 2.

Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the learned Assistant Public Prosecutor appearing for respondentI State.

3.

Irarned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the cause in the present criminal petition does not survive for adjudication. Therefore, no further orders are required and I hence seeks to dismiss the same as infructuous. 4.

karned Assistant Public Prosecutor appearing for respondent-State by furnishing the online case status would I I submit that the case was disposed of by order dated 17.08.2015 in C.C.No.675 of 2OlI on the file of Chief Metropolitan To substantiate the same, learned Magistrate, Hyderabad.

)

I Assistant Public Prosecutor filed online copy ol the e-court proceedings.

5.

Recording the submissions made by both the learned counsel, this Court is inclined to dismiss the present criminal petition as infructuous.

6.

Accordingly, this criminal petition is dismissed as infructuous.

Miscellaneous petitions, if aly, pending in this criminal I petition, shall stand closed.

SD/. A.V.S.PRASAD ASSISTANT REGISTRAR \ s/ /ffRUE COPY// ,/] SECTION OFFICER To, The Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Hyderabad The Station House officer, ACB., Kurnool Range Police Station, Kurnool' One CC to Sri Pillix Law Firm, Advocate [OPUC] Two CCs to Public Prosecutor, High Court for the State of Telangana (OUT) c Two CD Copies BJLB \ V 1\

l !

HIGH COURT DATED:0211112023

ORDER

CRLP.No.14824 of 2014 CRIMINAL PETITION IS DISMISSED AS INFRUCTUOUS sr9 @