← Library
High Court for State of TelanganaWP/22761/2015disposed of no costs

Dharavathu Kousalya, v. The Associate Dean,

2015-07-23R.Kantha Rao4 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT HYDERABAD

FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AND THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH ***** Writ Petition No.22761 of 2015 Between Dharavathu Kousalya ... Petitioner and The Associate Dean, NTR College of Veternary Science, Near Airport, Gannavaram Post and Mandal, Krishna District-521 102;

and another ... Respondents DATE OF JUDGMENT PRONOUNCED: 23-7-2015 SUBMITTED FOR APPROVAL:

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE R.KANTHA RAO Whether Reporters of Local newspapers may be allowed to see the Judgments?

Yes/No Whether the copies of judgment may be marked to Law Reports/Journals Yes/No Whether Their Ladyship/Lordship wish to see the fair copy of the Judgment?

Yes/No HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE R.KANTHA RAO Writ Petition No.22761 of 2015 Order:

Heard Sri V.Rao Padala, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned Government Pleader for Employment and Training for the State of Andhra Pradesh appearing for the 2nd respondent.

2. The 1st respondent-College made a requisition to the 2nd respondent to sponsor candidates belonging to OC,

BC, SC and ST communities for the posts of Class IV (Animal Attendant). The grievance of the petitioner is that the respondents have not been receiving applications from the candidates other than those sponsored by the Employment Exchange. The present writ petition is therefore filed to direct the respondents to receive application form the petitioner for the post of Class IV (Animal Attendant) without insisting upon her name being sponsored by the Employment Exchange.

3. Reliance is placed by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner on Excise Superintendent, Machilipatnam, Krishna District, A.P., v.

K.B.N.

Visweshawara Rao,[1] wherein the Supreme Court has laid down categorically that restricting the selection only to the candidates sponsored by Employment Exchange is not proper. In addition to requisitioning the names from Employment Exchange, names should also be called for by publication in newspapers, having wide circulation and display on office notice boards or announcement of radio, television and employment news bulletins.

4. In view of the above judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court, the respondents are under obligation to receive the application from the petitioner.

5. Therefore, the respondents are directed to receive the application from the petitioner and allow her to participate

in the selection process including the written test and interviews to the existing vacancies of Class IV (Animal Attendant) posts without insisting that her name must be sponsored by the employment Exchange. The writ petition is disposed of accordingly. The miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this writ petition shall stand closed. No costs.

___________________ R.KANTHA RAO, J.

23rd July, 2015.

Ak HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE R.KANTHA RAO Writ Petition No.22761 of 2015

23rd July, 2015.

(Ak) [1] (1996) 6 SCC 216