Venkata Rao Patil v. The High Court Of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. By Its Registrar

[ 3393 ] HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE TWENTY FIRST DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE ALOK ARADHE AND THE HONOURABLE SHRI JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR JUKANTI WRIT PETITION NO:34627 OF 2013 Between:

Venkata Rao Patil, S/o. Late Pundalik Rao, aged about 61 years Occupation District and Sessions Judge (Rtd) R/o Flat No. 101 B Block PBR Estates, No.1-8702133118, Padma Colony, Nallakunta, Hyderabad. 500 044. PETITIONER AND The High Court of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Registrar, (Vigilance) High court of of A P Hyderabad ...RES'oNDENTS Petition under Arlicle 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction, more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS to declare the adverse remarks shown in the Letter ROC No.6714/201 1-B.SPL.

dated 07 -062012 of the respondent in the personal frle the petitioner as baseless, arbitrary, irrational, whimsical or capricious, against the Principles of Natural Justice and void, and consequently expunge the adverse remarks in the personal file the petitioner shown in the Letter Roc.No. 671412011B.SPL against the petitioner l.A NO: 1OF 20 3(WPMP. NO: 43073 OF 2013 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the operation of the adverse remarks shown in the Letter Roc.No.

671412011-B.SPL. of the respondent against the petitioner pending disposal of the main Writ Petition l.A. NO: 2 OF 2013(WPMP. NO:43800 0F 2013) Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to permit the petitioner to file the additional documents as material papers in Wp No. 34627 of 2013 and receive the same in the interest of justice Counsel for the Petitioner: SRl. N. SREENTVASA YADAV Counsel for the Respondents: M/s. V. UMA DEVI (SC FOR HC TSHC) The Court made the following: ORDER

THE HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE ALOK ARADHE AND THE HON'BLE SHRI JTISTICE ANIL KUMAR WKANTI WRIT PETITION No.34627 of 2OL3 ORDER.. (Per the Hon'ble the Chief Justice Alok Aradhe) None for petitioner.

2.

It appears, the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the petition.

3.

Therefore, the Writ Petition is dismissed for want of prosecution. There sha-Il be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, sha-ll stand closed.

SD/. K.SREERAMA MURTHY ASSISTANT REGl //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To,

1. One CC to SRl. N. SREENIVASA YADAV, Advocate [OPUC]

2. One CC to M/s. V. UMA DEVI (SC FOR HC TSHC) [OPUC]

3. Two CD Copies BM GJ 4

HIGH COURT DATED:21 11212023 .[ATE Q S o Ih\ 1\1\ tro o + I DESPpfl

ORDER

WP.No.34627 of 2013 DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION FOR NONPROSECUTION WITHOUT COSTS @q?o* w