Sri Seetharamachandra Swamy Vari Devasthanam v. Bavisetty Purushothama Naidu

[ 3208 I

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA

AT HYDERABAD FRIDAY, THE FOURTEENTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY TWO PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE P.SREE SUDHA APPEAL SUIT NO: 2324 OF 2002 Appeal under Section 96 of CPC R/w. Rule 47(1) of A.P. Agency Rules 1924 against the Judgment and decree dated 23t11t2001 made in OS No.101 of 1998 on the file of the Court of the Special Assistant Agent (Sub-Cotlector), Mobile Court, Bhadrachalam.

Between:

Sri SeethararRachandra Swamy Vari Devasthanam, Bhadrachalm, rep. by Executive ...APPEI.LANT officer AND

1. Bavisetty Purushothama Naidu, C/o Velaga Venkata Rao

2. Akula Yugandhar, S/o Kanthaiah ...RESPONDENTS For the Appellant : SRI K.RAVI, Advocate (not present) For the Respondent No.2 : SRI K.MANIKYALA RAO, Advocate The Court delivered the followirtg : JUDGMENT

HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE P.SREE SUDHA APPEAL SUIT NO.2324 OF 2OO2 ORDER:

Appellant Counsel absent. He was absent on 26.L2.2002, L1.O4.2022, 27 .06.2022, 30.06.2022, and hence the matter was listed under the caption "for dismissal" to O5.O7.2O22. Even today, he could not appear, hence, as he failed to turn up, the appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution.

In view of the s€une, the appeal suit is dismissed for non-prosecution. No costs.

As a sequel, all the pending miscellaneous applications shall stand closed.

-/ Sd/-K.SAILESHI DEPUTY REGISTRAR /TRUE COPY// cib \ SECTION OFFICER To , Mobile Court, Bhadrachalam.

PUCI The Special Assistant Agent ( One CC to Sri K.Manikyala Rao, Advocate One CC to Sri K.Ravi, Advocate IOPUC] Two CD Copies \ V Kj

cHIGH COURT DATED:1411012022 /r TA16:

s '{ I E [Pn ?[23 ;( oo

ORDER

fri:.

,!

i!/-t AS.No.2324 of 2002 ) i I DISMISSED FOR NON.PROSECUTION.

I I :