M.Gridhar, Hyd v. The State Of Ts., Rep. By P.P. And Another

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA

AT HYDERABAD MONDAY, THE FIFTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENry TWO PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE CHILLAKUR SUMALATHA CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 783 OF 2017 Between:

M. Gridhar, S/o. M.V. Subba Rao, aged Major, Occ: Business, Rl/o Giridhar production House .Khairthabad, Hyderabad

...Petitioner/Accused

AND

1. The State of Telangana, Through P.S. Saifabad, represented by the Public prosecutor, High court Buildings, Hyderabad.

2. Prassana, B. Slo not known, aged major, Occ: Business, Rto Zee Entertainment Enterprises Ltd. R/o6-2-929, Khairthabad, Hyderabad

...Respondent

Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to quash the Proceedings of Cr.No 563/2016 on the file of the P.S. Saifabad, Hyderabad.

l.A. NO: 1 OF 2017(CRLPMP. NO: 737 OF 20171 Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay the investigation of Cr.No.563i20'16 o the file of the P.S. Saifabad, including the arrest of the petitioner. This Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of Sri J.C. FRANCIS, Advocate for the Petitioner and the Additional Public Prosecutor on behalf of the Respondent No.1, and of Sri TULSI RAJ GOKUL, Advocate for the Respondent No. 2 The Court made the following: ORDER

HON'BLE DT. JUSTICE CHILLAKUR SUMALATHA CRIMINAL PETITIONNo.783 of 2OL7 ORDER:

1. The present Criminal Petition is filed seeking the Court to quash the proceedings that are pending against the petitioner in Crime No.563 of 2Ot6 of Saifabad Police Statiop, HYderabad'

2.

No representation on petitioner's side on call'

3. On the other hand, learned Additional Public Prosecutor, on written instructions, submits that charge sheet is filed and therefore, the Criminal Petition has become infructuous.

4. In the light of the said submission, the Criminal Petition is dismissed. However, liberty is granted to the petitioner to move a fresh petition in case the cause survives.

As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed.

Sd/- K. VENKAIAH ASSISTANT REGISTRAR /( i, , //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To,

1. The Station House Officer, Police Station, Saifabad, Hyderabad'

2. Two CC to the Public Prosecutor, High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad. [OUT]

3. One CC to Sri. J.C. FRANCIS, Advocate IOPUC]

I

4. One CC to Sri. A. TULST RAJ GOKUL

5. Two CD Copies

6. Two Spare Copies Advocate tOpUCj PSR J it

HIGH COURT csL,J DATED:0511212022 \ \ NG 4.

C\J ti L1 t-- a - i a qJ a -t

ORDER

CRLP.No.783 of 2017 DISMISSED @ (A j [\"1 I -