R. Hanmanthu v. Sri. Maruthi Prasad,

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA

AT HYDERABAD MONDAY, THE FOURTEENTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY TWO PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI CONTEMPT CASE NO: 1530 OF 2012 Contempt case under Sections 10 to 12 of the Contempt of Court Act, to punish the respondents herein for willful, deliberate disobedience of the orders of the Hon'ble High Court dated 18-07-2012 made in W.P.No.2't 678 of 2012. Between:

1. R. Hanmanthu, S/o. Dasa Yellappa, Aged 53 years, Occ: Civil Contractor, R/o. MIGH Q.No.4, APHB Colony, Kanteshwer, Nizamabad proper and District.

...PETITIONEFYPETITIONER AND

1. Sri. Maruthi Prasad, Commissioner, The Sadashivpet Municipality, Sadashivpet, Medak District.

2. Sri. Moorthy, Special officer, The Sadashivpet Municipal Council, Sadashivpet, Medak District.

3. Sri. Rajendra Prasad, Superintendent E I\,4unicipal Engineering Department, The Hyderabad.

ngineer, West Circle, Public and Government of Andhra Pradesh, ...RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS Counsel for the Petitioner : Sri K. VENUMADHAV Counsel for the Respondent No. 1 : MTS.SHANTHI NEELAM Counsel for the Respondent No. 2 : Govt. Pleader For Muncipal Admn., Counsel for the Respondent No. 3 : Sri V. CH. NAIDU The Court made the following: ORDER

I. ]N'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANN=(!AIITI CONTEMP T CASE NO.1530 ,)f 2101 2

ORDER

Learn( C counsel for the petitioner submits that tl-re cause in the Contempt Ca,e does not survive for adjudication and the same has become infru< luous.

Recon ng the said submission, the Contempt Ca:;e is dismissed as infructuour . No order as to costs.

Misce aneous petitions, if any pending in this Contentpt Case, n shall stand di missed c |\vENK.ATESW )[:PUTY REGIS U R ?

I //TRUE COPY// SE(:TIO FFICER \ To,

1. Sri Maruthi )rasad, Commissioner, The Sadashivpet Nlunicipality, Sadashivpel Medak District.

2. Sri Moorthy Special officer The Sadashivpet Municipal Council, Sadashivpet, Medak Distr 1.

3. Sri Rajendr Prasad, Superintendent Engineer, West Oir:le, Public and Municipal Er grneering Department, The Govemment oi Andhra Pradesh, Hyderabad.

4. One CC to ;ri K. VENUMADHAV, Advocate [OPUC]

5. One CC to I ITS.SHANTHI NEELAM, Advocate [OPUC]

6. One CC to GP for Muncipal Admn., & Urban Dev ,Higrh Court for the State of Telangan r [OUTI

7. One CC to I ri V. CH. NAIDU, Advocate [OPUC]

8. Two CD Co ,ies.

.&..-- njb

j HIGH COURT LKJ DATED:14111 2022 gF i!.ih* 'ar i (v \ cu.

$ 1i tl

ORDER

.'') uoru' .2) '\--=;2CC.No.1530 c 12012 DISMISST\*(i ]-ttE ('R \ltNAL pETITION AS INFRUCTUOIJS .: V'

l,/ {v) )) eo