Kandanoolu Veerendra Kumar v. Kandanoolu Varalakshmi

HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE A.RAJASHEKER REDDY CRP No. 5549 OF 2015 ORDER :

This Civil Revision Petition is filed challenging the order dated 05.08.2015 in I.A.No.2626 of 2012 in O.S.No.44 of 2011, wherein the application filed by the respondents/plaintiffs for appointing Advocate Commissioner to ascertain the mesne profits over the petition schedule properties during pendency of the suit and allot 2/3rd share of the petitioners, was allowed.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner.

Already preliminary decree was passed and it became final and I.A.No.2626 of 2012 was allowed appointing Advocate Commissioner to ascertain the mesne profits over the petition schedule properties during pendency of the suit. Moreover, as on today, the preliminary decree is subsisting. Learned counsel for the petitioner has not brought to the notice of this Court what is the error committed by the trial Court in passing the impugned order. I do not see any infirmity or illegality in the order passed by the Court below.

Accordingly, this Civil Revision Petition is dismissed. No costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this CRP shall stand closed.

____________________________ A.RAJASHEKER REDDY, J 22.01.2016 kvs HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE A.RAJASHEKER REDDY

CRP.No.5549 OF 2015 Date:22.01.2016 kvs