← Library
High Court for State of TelanganaCRP/788/2016dismissed for default

V Vijayanirmala, Hyderabad v. V Narayana Charyulu, R.R. Dist

2021-12-24Chillakur Sumalatha3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA

AT HYDERABAD FRIDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY ONE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DT. JUSTICE CHILLAKUR SUMALATHA CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 788 OF 2016 Petition under Article 227 of lhe Constitution of lndia aggrieved by the order dated 01-1 1-2010 in 1.A.No.838 of 2010 in F.C.O.P.No.70 of 2006 on the fite of the Court of the Judge, Family Court, Hyderabad, Between:

V. Vijayanirmala, D/o Sri S.K. Krishnamacharyulu, aged 39 years, Occ: House Wife, R/o B-3-1 69/1 6, Siddarthanagar, Hyderabad. ...PETTTIONER (PETtTtONER) AND V. Narayana Charyulu, S/o V. Ramachari, Aged 39 yrs, Occ: Poojari, RJo: Kodakanchi, Zinnaram lvlandal, R.R.District PRESENTLY RESIDING AT: V.Narayanacharyulu S/olate V.Ramachari, aged 47 yrs, R/o. G-2-6/17, Sai Dharmam Res., Beeram Guda Village, R.C.Puram Mandal, t\/edak District. I ...RESPONDENT (RESPONDENT) Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI R. SATYANARAYANA SWAMY Counsel forthe Respondent: NONE APPEARED The Court made the following: ORDER

HONOT'RABLE DT. JUSTICE CHILLAKUR SUMALATHA CIVIL REVISION PRTITI ON No.7 88 of 2O1 6 / ORDER:

As there was no representation on petitioner's side when the matter was listed on 15.12.2021, the matter was again listed to ,// 24.12.2021 under the caption for 'dismissal'' Even today there is / no representation on behalf of the petitioner. Hence, the civil revision petition is dismissed for non prosecution. Pending Miscellaneous Petitions, .if any, shall stand closed. I There shall be no order as to costs.

SD/.K.VENKAIAH ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// & SECTION OFFICER \ To,

1. The Judge, Family Court at Hyderabad l

2. One CC to Sri R. Satyanarayana Swamy, Advocate [OPUC]

3. Two CD CoPies

4. One Spare CoPY gbr s.\>

HIGH COURT DATED: 2411212021 1 $-g STA \ .:

2 5 ,tl.u z0zz -4. ;

i"

i\ ..-, .- ,

ORDER

CRP.No.788 of 2016 DISMISSING THE CRP FOR NON PROSECUTION v