Mirjaguda Gram Panchayat, v. Sri M.Raghunandan Rao, Ias,
This judgment came from a scanned document and its text layer is unreliable — words may be garbled. Check the original PDF before relying on any passage.
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA
AT HYDERABAD FRIDAY, THE TWENTY NINTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE J SREENIVAS RAO CONTE M PT CASE No.293 0F 2017 contempt case fired under Sections 10 to 12 of contempt of courts Act to summon the Respondent herein and punish him for wirfury and deriberatery disobeying the orders passed by this The Honorable High court in w.p No.7037 of 2014 dated 01.02.2016 BETWEEN:
Mirjaguda Gram Panchayat,, _ Mirjaguda, Rep. by its Sarpanch p.Sanieev Kumar s/o vittataiah. aried"35 i;!;i-n," iirid.ijiri"i,i'iIt'jlrol Vit'lii"l Shankarpali Mandat, narisa nedo'y Di#i"itocj bz"sl " ...PETITIONERY PETITIONER AND Sri M.Raghunandan Rao. lAS, District Collector, Ranga Reddy District at Hyderabad.
...RESPONDENT/ RESPONDENT NO.2 Counsel for the petitioner : Sri. V Ravi Kiran Rao Counsel for the Respondent : GP for Revenue The Court made the following: Order
THE HON'BLE SRT JUSTICE J. SREENTVAS RAO coNTEMPT CASENo.293of 2017 ORDER:
The contempt case is filed respondent under Sections I0 to 12 Act, 1gZ1, for deliberate and seeking to punish the of the Contempt of Courts willful disobedience in implementing the order passed by this Court in W.p.No.7O37 of 2014, dated O1.02.2016.
2. Heard Sri Y.Neelakanta Reddy, Iearned V.Ravi Kiran Rao, learned counsel petitioner and learned Assistant Government pleader for Revenue appearing on behalf of respondent counsel representing Sri for the \ \ J Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that rnsprte of specific direction issued by this Court on 01.02.2016, rhe respondent not complied with the order \ , I 4.
per contra, learned Assistant Government pleader respondent considered the claim of the petrtioner/Gram panchayat and allotted the revenue share in submits that, the
) respect of the land's allotted to the petitroner/Gram panchayat to a tune of Rs.56,64,798/- from 2OOt-2002 to 2016- 2017. 5.
In view of the specific averments made by the respondent in para 6 of the counter affidavit, no further adjudicatio n is required.
6.
Accordingly, the Contempt Case is closed. However, the petitioner is granted liberty to avail the remedies as are available under law, if so advised.
Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand closed.
so/-cH.VENKATESWARLU / DEPUW BEGISTRAR / a,/ //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To,
1. Sri M.Raghunandan Rao, IAS' District Collector' Ranga Reddy District at Hyderabad.
Z. One CC to SRl. V Ravi Kiran Rao, Advocate [OPUC]
3. Two CCs to GP FOR Revenue, High Court for the State of Telangana [OUT]
4. Two CD CoPies KMS P^^2,.
HIGH COURT JSR, J DATED: 29t12t2023 f-LAN .=-s * oul l.*Y cx w f-(oo, a LtT- I(.)t- * i \+ a)
ORDER
CC.No.293 of 2017 CLOSED THE CONTEMPT CASE (^ ?-\ -\ \