Ch. Narasimhulu, v. The State Of Telangana,

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT HYDERABAD

FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA & THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE FIRST DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND FIFTEEN PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE VILAS V. AFZULPURKAR WRIT PETITION No.19652 of 2015 BETWEEN Ch. Narasimhulu and two others.

... PETITIONERS AND The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, (Revenue, Stamps and Registration) Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad and others. ...RESPONDENTS Counsel for the Petitioner: MR. G.L.NARASIMHA RAO Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR REVENUE (TG) The Court made the following:

ORDER:

The writ petition is thoroughly misconceived. Petitioners seek to stop the registration of documents presented by respondents 7 to 9 in favour of

some third parties. Petitioners claim that they are the owners of the land in their possession and that respondent No.7 has no title but he is still executing sale deeds. Hence, a Mandamus, as prayed for, is sought.

2. I am unable to see any locus standi for the petitioners to question the action of respondents 3 and 6 in entertaining the registrations of respondent No.7 and the relief sought for amounts to restraining third parties from entering into sale transactions and resisting the same. If respondent No.7 has no legal title, it is for the purchaser to verify the same and take the risk, but the petitioners, in any case, are not affected in any manner nor are bound by any such sale transactions.

Hence, the writ petition is dismissed. As a sequel, the miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand closed. There shall be no order as to costs.

______________________ VILAS V. AFZULPURKAR, J July 1, 2015 DSK