K.C.Laxmanna v. The Correspondent Cum Secretary

HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE FIFTEENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY TWO PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.LAKSHMAN WRlT PETITION NO: 19923 OF 2004 Between:

K.C.Laxmanna, S/o.K.Seshanna, aged 36 years, Occ : Unemployee, Rl/o' Room No.71, D-Hostel, (Tungabhadra) O.U.Capus, Hyderabad. ...PETITIONER AND '1 . The Correspondent Cum Secretary, G.M.Sanghi College of Commerce and Science Tarnaka, Secunderabad-1 72. The Director of Collegiate Education, A.P.Hyderabad.

3. The Principal Secretary, Government of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principal Secretary Higher Education (C.E.ll.2) Department, Hyderabad. ...RESPONDENTS Petition Under Article 226 of lhe Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of a writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 1st respondent in not issuing the appointment orders in accordance with G.O.Rt.No.724 Higher Education dated.1.10.2004 r/w Procgs.Rc.No.326iAdmn.Vll-112003, dated 15.10.2004 issued by the 2nd respondent as illegal, arbitrary and contrary to the law and consequently direct the 1st respondent to issue the appointment order in accordance with G.O.Rt.No.724 Higher Education dated 1-10.2004 rlw Procgs.Rc.No.326/Admn.Vll-'1/2003 dated 15.10.2004 issued by the 2nd respondent.

r.A. NO: 1 OF 2004(WPMP. NO: 2608 oF 2004) Petition under section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High court may be pleased to issue the appointment order to the petitioner in accordance with G.o.Rt.No.724 Higher Education dated 1.10.2004 read with Procgs.Rc.No.326/Admn.Vll-112003, dated '1 5-'10-2004 issued by the 2nd respondent. Counsei for the Petitioner : SRI.P.NARASIMHA Counsel for the Respondent No.1 : SRI.SHARAD SANGHI Counsel for the Respondent Nos.2 & 3 : GP FOR HIGHER EDUCATION The Court made the following ORDER

HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE K. LAKSHMAN IVRIT PETITION No.1992 3 of 2OA4 ORDER:

None appears for the petitioner. Sri Sharad Sanghi, learned counsel for the respondents would submit that he has no bundle arr.d he does not know the lis involved in the present writ petition. This writ petition is of the year 2OO4.

2. In view of the aforesaid. facts, this court is not in a position to re-construct the bund.le. Therefore, this writ petition is closed. There shall be no order as to costs

3. As a sequel, the miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in the Writ petition shall stand closed. I SD/-N.CHANDRA SEKHAR RAO ASSISTANT REGISTRAR ,/-, ( ll'

SECTION OFFICER To //TRUE COPY// Two CCs to GP FOR HIGHER EDUCATTON ,High Court fc,r the State of Telangana. [OUT] One CC to SRI.P.NARASIMHA, Advocate IOPUCI One CC to SRI.SHARAD SANGHt, Advoca'te tOpUCl Two CD Copies One spare copy J S.A BS k\\x

HIGH COURT DATED:1 510912022 ::-< dg STATC

ORDER

WP.No.19923 of 2004 aJ 21 l,till ?[I2 ) T'

C) i ,- i(:'I CLOSING THE W.P WITHOUT COSTS.

Qx'S