Dr K Venkata Raman v. The State Of Tg
[ 32ee ]
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA
AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE FIFTEENTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE E.V. VENUGOPAL WRIT PETITION NO: 10291 OF 2018 Between:
Dr. K. Venkata Ramana S/o. Omkari, Aged 48 years, Occ- Reqional Transoort Officer Rl/o. Hyderabad North Zone, Secunderabad, HyderabaE. ...PETITIONER AND The State of Telangana, Rep by its Principal Secretary, Transport Roads and Buildings, Secretariat, Hyderabad.
The Commissioner of Transport, Government of TetanSana,.{1dg;ajftB=r* Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit fired therewith, the High court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order, or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus by declaring that the action of the respondent in not concluding the Departmental enquiry against the petitioner even though the finding of the Enquiry officer is held in favour of the petitioner as wholly illegal, arbitrary, unconstitutional and violative of Article 14, 16 and 21 of constitution of lndia and consequently direct the respondents to drop the charge memo dated 28-06-2016 and declare the probation of the petitioner in the category of Regional rransport officer and further direct the respondents to consider the case of the Petitioner for promotion to the post of Deputy Transport Commissioner in the interest of justice.
lA NO: 1 OF 2018 Petition under Section 151 cPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to
direct the Respondents to consider lhe case of the Petitioner to the post of Deputy Transporl Commissioner in the existing vacancies without reference to the Charge Memo dated 28-06-2016 in the interest of justice, pending disposal of the above writ petition.
Counsel for the Petitioner: M/s. PRATAP NARAYAN SANGHI Counsel for the Respondents: SRI N. RAMU, GP FOR SERVICES lll The Court made the following: ORDER
THE HON'BLE SRT JUSTICE E.V.VENUC'OPAL W.P.No.1O291 of 2O18 ORDER:
1.
Ms. Swathi, learned counsel for the petitioner is fair enough to submit that in compliance of the order dated f O2.O4.2Ola passed by this Court, orders have been issued \ vide G.O.Rt.No.54, dated 16.02.2O19 by promoting the petitioner to the category of the Deputy Transport Commissioner for the panel year 2Ol8-2O 19. Therefore, Iearned counsel submits that no further orders are required to be passed in the present Writ Petition. Hence, seeks to close the Writ Petition.
2.
Mr. N. Ramu, learned Government Pleader for Services-Ill appearing for the respondents concedes to the same.
3.
Recording the submissions made by both the learned counsel, the Writ Petition is closed. There shall be no order as to costs.
4.
Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this Writ Petition, shall also stand closed.
SD/.MOHD SANAULLAH ANSARI ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// !- sEcTroN oFFtcER j .
To, One CC to SRI PRATAP NARAYAN SANGHI, Advocate TOPUCI Two CCs to GP FOR SERVICES lll, High Court for the State of Telangana. louTI Two CD Copies BN
HIGH COURT DATED:1 510312023 ss g vt o \ * o \\
ORDER
WP.No.10291 ot 2018 CLOSING THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS