M/S. Hyderabad Rock Sand v. Appellate Deputy Commissioner (Ct)
This judgment came from a scanned document and its text layer is unreliable — words may be garbled. Check the original PDF before relying on any passage.
[ 3295 I HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY TWO PRESENT THE HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE UJJAL BHUYAN AND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE C.V. BHASKAR REDDY WRIT PETITION NO: '14804 OF 2O2O Between:
M/s. Hyderabad Rock Sand, Sy.No.14, Sultanpur (V), Patancheru, Mandal, Telangana - 502319, represented by its Proprietor C.Satyanarayana Reddy S/o.C.Sitaram Reddy, aged about 63 years, residing at Hyderabad. ...PETITIONER AND
1. Appellate Deputy Commissioner (CT), Secundrabad Division.
2. Assistant Commissioner (CT), Audit, Nizamabad Division, Nizamabad.
3. Commercial Tax Officer, Sangareddy, Nrzamabad Division.
4. State ofTelangana, represented by the Principal Secretary, Revenue Department, Telangana Secretariat, Hyderabad. ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Arlicle 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, direction or order more particularly in the nature of a writ of mandamus declaring the assessment order A.O.No. 21863 dated 31/03/20'18 passed by the Respondent No.2 and consequently the impugned ADC Order No.988 dated 2810512020 passed by the Respondent No.1 as being void, illegal, violative of Article 265and consequently Article 286 of the Constitution of lndia, totally without jurisdiction and violative of the principles of natural justice. lA NO: 1 OF 2020 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay
/ all further proceed ngs and consequential actions pursuant to the ADC Order No.9B8 dated 2Bl0! 12020 passed by the Respondent No.1 . Counsel for the Pe ritioner: SRI M.NAGA DEEPAK Counsel for the Re;pondents: SRI K.RAJI REDDY FOR GP FifR COMMERCIAL TAX The Court made th r following: ORDER
/ THE HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE UJJAI BHIryAN AND THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.BTIASKAR REDDY WRIT PETITION No. 14804 of 2O2O ORDER: Per the Honble rhe Chief Justice Ujjol Bhugan) Deepak, learned counsel for the Heard Mr. M.Naga Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. K.Raji respondents.
2.
l,earned counsel for the petitioner submits that pursuant to One Time Settlement (OTS) Scheme introduced by the Government of Telangana, petitioner has settled the tax dispute with the State. Therefore, petitioner would like to withdraw the writ petition.
3.
In view of the above, writ petition is dismissed on n,ithdrawal.
Miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. However, there shall be no order as to costs. SD/.N.CHANDRA SEKHAR RAO ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// @ SECTION OFFICER I I To One CC to SRI M.NAGA DEEPAK, Advocate [OPUC] One CC to SRI K RAJI REDDY, Advocate [OPUC] Two CD Copies I PSK.
BS B9
\ \ HIGH COURT DATED:30,1212022
ORDER
WP.No.14804 ot 2020 /:ir I,'
31 JIN ?s8 -b I I DlSMlSSlN,i OF THE WRIT PETITION ON WITHDITAWAL WITHOUT COSTS.
L{iee w- //t l'L!,, -rr \' '