Smt. M.Divya v. M.R Avikanth Reddy

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA

AT HYDERABAD TUESDAY, THE NINETEENTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY TWO PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DT. JUSTICE cHILLAKUR SUMALATHA CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 3317 OF 2016 Petition under Nticle 227 of the constitution of lndia, againsu aggrieved by the orderdated 30/03/2016 passed in tA No.s75l2016 in FCop No.877l2016 on the file of lV Additional District Judge -cum- lAdditional Family Judge, Ranga Reddy District at L.B.Nagar.

Between:

Smt. M.Divya, W/o M.Ravikanth Reddy, ...PETITIONER/PETITIONER AND Ir/.Ravikanth Reddy, S/o M. Bhupathi Reddy, ...RESPONDENT CRPMP. NO: 4250 OF 2016 Petition under Section 151 cpc praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High court may be pleased to grant stay of all further proceedings in FCoP No.877 ol 2016 on the file of lv Additional District Judge- cum -l Additional Family Judge, Ranga Reddy District at L.B.Nagar, pending disposal of the main Revision.

For the Petitioner : SMT D|WA (PARTY-IN-PERSON) For the Respondent : SRI P.RAMACHANDRAN, Advocate The Court made the following: ORDER

HONOURABLE Dr. JUSTICE CHILLAKUR SUMALATHA CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.3317 of 2Ot6 ORDER:

Challenge in this Civil Revision petition is the order rendered by the court of IV Additional District Judge-cum-I Additional Family Judge, Ranga Reddy District at L.B.Nagar, in I.A.No.575 of 2OL6 in FCOP.No.877 of 2016, dated 30.3.2016.

No representation on petitioner,s side on call though the matter is listed under the caption "for dismissal". on 11.4.2022 the following order was passed:

"The petitioner who is appearing as party-in_person fails to represent.

Learned counsel appearing for the respondent submits that the CRP has become infructuous as the application filed for custody of the child itself was withdrawn by the respondent herein as the child has become major. In the light of the said submission and as there is no representation on petitioner,s side, list the matter on 19.4.2022 under the caption "for dismissal".,, In the light of the aforementioned order and as there is no representation on petitioner's side even on this day, this civil Revision Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. No costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed Sd/-P,PADMANABHA REDDY ASSISTANI REGISTRAR /.Lt) \ ,TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To The lV Additional District Judge-cum- I Additional Family Judge' at L.B.Nagar One CC to One CC to Smt Divya, (Party-in Sri F.Ramachandra Two CD Copies One Spare Copy ,.'.cz:Fa1.

2.

-person) (OPUC) n, Advocate (OPUC) 4.

HIGH COURT DATED:1910412022 P.E STA ?'€ ( a:

oo 2 I JUi'I 2022 '1 I -1 ',/ * o6,5 PATC

ORDER

CRP.No.3317 of 2016 DISMISSING THE CRP FOR NON.PROSECUTION WITHOUT COSTS.