High Court for State of TelanganaWP/13445/2017disposed of no costs

Gourishetty Munender, v. The State Of Telangana, Represented By Its Principal

2017-04-17S.V.Bhatt2 pages

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE S.V.BHATT WRIT PETITION No. 13445 of 2017 ORDER:

Petitioner prays for the following relief :- " ..... to Issue a writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate writ or order or direction declaring the inaction of the respondent No. 3 to 5 in conducting survey and demarcating and fixing boundaries of the petitioner's land admeasuring Ac.0-20 gts in Sy.No. 58/ 10 Sitarampur Village, Karimnagar Mandal and Karimnagar District pursuant to the application in A3/ 73/ 2016 dated 17-02-2016 as arbitrary & illegal and consequently direct the respondent No. 3 to 5 to conduct survey and demarcate the petitioner's land admeasuring Ac. 0-20gts in Sy.No.58/ 10 Sitarampur Village, Karimnagar Mandal and Karimnagar District and fix the boundaries..."

At the time of hearing, it is represented by both the learned counsel that the subject matter of writ petition is covered by judgment of this Court in W.P.No.4811 of 2011 & Batch, dated 28.04.2016 and sought for a similar direction in this writ petition also. In view of the above submission, the writ petition is disposed of by this order:

(i) The petitioner is directed to place all the documents on which he is relying upon by enclosing a copy of this order before respondents 3 to 5 within three weeks from today.

(ii) The respondent-authorities are directed to consider the application of the petitioner for survey and demarcation of lands after receiving necessary charges, keeping in view the Circulars vide Rc.No.N1/ 1408/ 07, dated 13-07-2007, Rc.No.N1/ 6543 / 99, dated 25-07-2001

and Circular vide Rc.No.N2/ 1741/ 2010, dated 18-05-2010 and also in terms of the judgment in W.A.No.618 of 2013 and also keeping in view the provisions of Sections 89, 89-A and 92 of the Andhra Pradesh (Telangana Area) Land Revenue Act, 1317 Fasli and take necessary action and communicate the decision to the petitioner.

(iii) It is open for the petitioner to prefer appeal against the said order, if so aggrieved, in terms of circulars referred to above.

The writ petition is disposed of accordingly. As a sequel, the miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. There shall be no order as to costs.

_____________ S. V. BHATT, J April 17, 2017 Prv