← Library
High Court for State of TelanganaCRP/4761/2013dismissed for default

Rajkumar Bharatlal v. Abdul Raheem Shareef And Another

2022-12-30A.Venkateshwara Reddy3 pages

This judgment came from a scanned document and its text layer is unreliable — words may be garbled. Check the original PDF before relying on any passage.

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA

AT HYDERABAD FRIDAY ,THE THIRTIETH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY TWO PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE A.VENKATESHWARA REDDY CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO:4761 OF 2013 Petition under Section 22 of A.P. Buildings (Lease, Rent & Eviction control ...Rr!HGrc rf.,,t-{ t'.{ +ts Act, 1960f*lomnion OrOer dated 05/08/2013 in R.A. No- 6712012 and R'A'No' 7/20.13 passed by the Hon'ble Additional chief Judge, city small causes courts, Hyderabad.

Between:

Rajkumar Bharatlal S/o Late Raja Triambaklal, Aged 79 Years, Occ:- Retd Service, Ft/o Plot No.71, Whisper Valley, Raidueg Khalsa, R'R'Dist' - Hydeiabad.

...PETITIONER AND

1. Abdul Raheem Shareef S/o Late Abdul Rehman Shareef, Aged 45 years' Occ:- Business

2. Abdul Lateef Shareef, S/o Late Abdul Rehman Shareef, Aged 42 Years, Occ:- Business (Both R/o H.No.19-3-306/1 1 , Jahanuma, Hyderabad.) ...RESPONDENTS Counsel for the Petitioner: SRl. RAKESH SANGHI Counsel for the Respondents: NONE APPEARED The Court made the following: ORDER

THE HON.BLI} SRI WSTICE A.VENKATESHWA.fu\ R.EDDY CwIL RDVISION PETTTION NO'4761 OFI?IIl3 qBPEE Heardletrnedcounselfortherevisionpetitioner.Pt:rused the proceedin 3s dated 08'02'2O 17' wherein it is clearly mentioned tha I sole revision petitioner died in the Y ear 20 15 and no steps \ /ere taken. Accordingly' there was a conditional order to the e fect that in default of taking steps cn or before 20.O2.2O17 t,'ris Civil Revision Petition stands disrnissed automaticallY.

2. There after, this Civil Revision Petition was not listed and till date nc such steps are taken' Therbfore' hzLving regard to the fact, while giving effect to the proceec ings dated Oa.O2.2C 17, tt is Civil Revision Petition is dismissed for clefault' In the circumr itances of the case, there shall be no order as to thecosts.Mircellaneousapplications,ifanyperlding,shall stands closed Sd/. K. VENKAIAH / AssrsrANr Sqt}ll :;ECTION OFFICER //TRUE COPY// To,

1. The Additional )hief Judge' City Small Causes Courts al llyderabad

2. One CC to SRI RAKESH SANGHI' Advocate [OPUC]

3. Two CD CoPie '

VH w

\ HIGH COUR IAVR, J DATED:3011212022 '/a ,AE STAI€ .} /, /a zo]:

,(1 ')'

o

ORDER

CRP.No.476' of 2013 2 q FEB ru23 II Dismissed fbr C .R.P. for default 5caro lq-"

ifr"