Shaikh Abdul Munaf, Kotta Peta, Kurnool v. Sabina Bano, Toli Chowki, Hyd And 3 Others, Rep.By Pp., Hyd

[ 325e ] HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD TUESDAY, THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY TWO PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE D.NAGARJUN CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 92'l OF 2011 Criminal Revision Case under Section 397 & 401 of Crl.P.C against the Judgment in Crl.MP No.3212011 dated 281021201 1 on the file of the Court of the Metropolitan Sessions Judge, Hyderabad.

Between:

Shaikh Abdul Munaf, S/o Peta, Kurnool.

Shaikh Abdul Jabbar Unemployed R/o. 41-304, Kotta ...PETITIONER AND 'l . Sabina Bano, D/o. Abdul Aziz Physiotherapist

2. Abdul Fatah, S/o. Shaikh Abdul Munaf aged 9 years

3. Nabeeha Farhana, D/o. Shaikh Abdul Munaf aged 5 years (RR 2& 3 natural guardian rep. by (R1) (all R/o.9-4-136/153, Quli Qutub Shah Nagar, Tombs Road, Toli Chowki, Hyderabad. Also residing at 18-257, Hanumanpet, Malkajgiri, Hyderabad)

4. The State of A.P., Rept. by its Public Prosecutor, High C6urt of A.p., Hyderabad.

...RESPONDENTS CRLRCMP. NO: 1380 OF 2011 Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of grounds of Criminal Revision Case, the High Court may be pleased to expedite the hearing of the above revision case. This petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Memorandum of grounds of Criminal Revision Case and upon hearing the arguments of Sri Shafat Ahmed Khan, Advocate for the petitioner and of the Public Prosecutor (TG) on behalf of the Respondent No.4 and None Appeared for Respondents No.1 to 3. The Court made the following: ORDER

THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE D.NAGARJUN CRIMINAL REVISION CASE No.921 of 2OLL ORDER:

This Criminal Revision Case is preferred against the Order dated 28-O2-2Oll passed by the learned Metropolitan Sessions Judge, Hyderabad 1n Crl.M.P.No.32 of 2)tl wherein the petition for condonation of delay was dismissed.

02. When the matter has been taken up for hearing, the iearned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the matter has become infructuous.

03. The same is recorded.

04. In view of the above submission, nothing survives to proceed with this Criminal Revision Case and the same is liable to be dismissed'

05. Accordingly, this Criminal Revision Case is dismissed as infructuous. There is no order as to costs. I

As a sequel, pending Miscelianeous Applications, if any, shaJl stand closed.

Sd/-K.SRINIVASA RAO JOINT REGISTRAR ;

//TRUE COPYII @ SECTION OFFICER To

1. The tMetropolitan Sessions Judge, Hyderabad.

2. Two CCs to the Public Prosecutor, High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad (OUT)

3. One CC to Sri Shafath Ahmed Khan, Advocate [OPUC]

4. Two CD Copies Kj

HIGH COURT DATED:1811012022 ,'.-r- ST.116 oi q'

.) [ 2 HA\ 2$?3

ORDER

CRLRC.No.921 of 2011 DISMISSING THE CRL.R.C. AS INFRUCTUOU S, WITHOUT COSTS.

@crPl$ 1/w