M.Chandra Shekar v. Govt Of A.P
This judgment came from a scanned document and its text layer is unreliable — words may be garbled. Check the original PDF before relying on any passage.
[ 33041 HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Speciat Original Jurisdiction) MOll_Dly ,THE THTRT|ETH DAy OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTTCE NAMAVARAPU RAJESHWAR RAO WRIT PETITION NO: 18046 0F 2010 Between:
M.Chandra Shekar, . _S/o !a!e M.Janardhan Conductor,E.No 210946 pragathinagar,Manctrat noia,-rbirnirpli.Jil,x"nga Reddy Diskict AND ...PET|ilONER '1' Govt of A'p. reo-bv its. principar secretary, Department of rransport,Road and ^ p{{ng Lq,. r r j sdcretariii, Fivtuii'6u"j-',' ""t ' ftId""#ja"' Rep'by its Managing Director, Bus Bhavan,RTC X Road, . IBl...EX;EEI;IE,. Director,A.p.s.R.r.c, Hyderabad city Zone, o Eli"'"f0"3'offi"r#31''n'r'APSRrc' Hvderabad citv Region,M.G.B.s t lt:r,3.0., Manager,ApSRTC, Bus Depot, tbrahimpatnam, Ranga Reddy ,...ndspouoeurs Petition under Articre 226 0f the constitution of rndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit fired therewith, the High court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ or direction particularly one in the nature of wit of Mandamus, declaring the impugned G.
o Ms No 145 dt 01_07_2009,as weil as the consequential impugned proceedings No.OS4/2SS(3 6)12007 -p.O.lll da1ed,04-07-2009,proc.NO E3tz14(o1to'-HCZdated 22-07-2oog in regurarizing the petitioner services onry w.e.f.O1- o7-2oog arong with others instead of regularizing the petitioner service from the dated of initial appointment or at least from the date of compretion of 240 days of service, i.e 01-08-2003 0n par with other colleagues as illegal, discriminatory, arbitrary, unjust, capricious and consequently, the petitioner pray this Hon,bre court may be preased to the direct the respondents to regularizing vide proc.
and P21255(1)104-IBP dated 10-1 1-2004 and other along with all consequential benefits following out of such regularization in the interest of justice l.A. NO: 1 OF 2010(WPMP. NO: 22802 oF 2010 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents NO 2 to 5 to regularize the petitioner service from 01-082003 on parwith Colleagues covered by vide proc NO p2l2SS(1)tO3-tBp dt 12-32003 and P21255(1)104-IBP dt 10-1 1-2004 disposal of the above wp I Counsel for the Petitioner: SRl. V. NARASIMHA GOUD Counsel for the Respondent No.1: GP FOR TRANSPORT Counsel for the Respondent Nos. 2to5: SRI R. ANURAG (SC FOR TSRTC) The Court made the following: ORDER
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE NAMAVARAPU RA]ESHWAR RAO ON 60F RI
ORDER
When the matter is taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner informed that there are no instructions from the petitioner and he does not have any information regarding further details of the case. 2.
In view of the above submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner, the writ petition is closed, giving liberty to the petitioner to approach the court, if any cause survives in the writ petrticn. There shaii be no order as to costs.
As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, rn this lrrii Petit ion, shall stand closed.
SD/. V.KAVITHA ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// ION OFFICER To, One CC to SRl. V. NARASIMHA GOUD,Adrocate-L9.iVCl o;; ac io sni. n. ANURAG (sc FoR rsRJC) tgPUCli;; cc;l; cp ion rnnrus'poRT, High court-for the state of relangana' Z I \ at Hyderabad [OUT] Two CD Copies BM PSK ?*, --r
HIGH COURT DATED:3011212024 g S I.^.
1ti rq i-) 1/ FEB 2025 fSpArCti i
ORDER
WP.No.18046 of 2010 CLOSING THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUTCOSTS @ W