Abdul Gaffar Shaik v. The State Of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. By Its Principal Secretary

HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE A.RAJASHEKER REDDY WRIT PETITION No.9590 OF 2017 ORDER:

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Government Pleader for Revenue. With the consent of both the parties, the Writ Petition is disposed of at the admission stage itself.

2.

The present Writ Petition came to be filed seeking issuance of writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 3rd respondent in not renewing the petitioner's notary certificate pursuant to his application dated 22.02.2017, as illegal and arbitrary.

3.

It is represented by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the issue involved in the writ petition is squarely covered by the order of this Court, dated 02.12.2016, rendered in W.P.No.9655 of 2016 and Batch, and the same is not disputed by the learned Government Pleader for Revenue. 4.

In that view of the matter, this writ petition is allowed in terms of the said order. There shall be no order as to costs. 5.

Miscellaneous petitions, pending if any, shall stand closed in the light of this final order.

_________________________ A.RAJASHEKER REDDY,J 17.03.2017 tk