Jarupla Padmavathi v. The State Of Telangana And 2 Others
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original J urisdiction) TUESDAY, THE FIFTEENTH DAY OF SEPTEIVBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE A.ABHISHEK REDDY WRIT PETITION NO: 14950 OF 2020 Between:
Jarupla Padmavathi, W/o Jarupla Jeetya Naik, Age . 46 Years Rlo 18-13-8169712, Rajiv Gandhi Nagar, Bandlaguda, Chandrayangutta, Hyderabad. ...PETITIONER AND The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Principal Secretary to Transport Department, BRKR Bhavan, Tankbund, Hyderabad.
The Transport Commissioner, Dr B.R.Ambedkar Transport Bhavan, Khairatabad, Hyderabad.
The Secretary Regional Transport Authority, South Zone, Bahadurpura, Hyderabad ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of lhe Constitutron of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in not considering the request of the petitioner for conversion of the vehicle from [\/axi cab to Omini Bus of the petitioner bearing Registration No.
TS 01 UA 0027 - lt/axi cab as illegal, arbitrary, malafide and also in gross violation of articles 14, 16 and 21 of the Constitution of lnd ia lA NO: 1 OF 2020 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents to convert the vehicle of the petitioner from Maxi cab to Omini Bus under Section 47 of MV Act, 1988 pending disposal of the above Writ Petition Counsel for the Petitioner: M/S.
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE A.ABHISHEK REDDY WRIT PETITION No.14950 of 2O2O ORDER:
Heard the learned counsel for petitioner and the learned Government Pleader for Transport for respondents. With their consent, the Writ Petition is disposed of at the stage of admission. The main grievance of the petitioner is that the respondents are not considering the request of the petitioner for conversion of her vehicle from Maxi Cab to Omini Bus under Section 47 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.
The learned Government Pleader for Transport submits that without making necessary application for conversion of the vehicle from Maxi Cab to Omini Bus, the petitioner straight away filed the present Writ Petition.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner will make appropriate application before the competent authority for conversion of the vehicle by paying necessary fee. In vier.r, of the above submissions made by both the parties, the Writ Petition is disposed of granting liberty to the petitioner to make appropriate application before the competent authority b1, paying necessary fee. On such application being received, the competent authority is directed to dispose of the said application within a period of six (6) weeks from the date of receipt of such application.
The miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. There shall be no order as to costs.
SD/. K.SAILESHI ASSISTANT REGISTRAR v.'
SECTION OFFICER //TRUE COPY// To, The Principal Secretary to Transport Department' State of Telangana BRKR Bhavan, Tbnkbund, HYderabad.
iii;i;;.;il't commi6i,on;ibr B.R'Ambedkar rransport Bhavan' Khairatabad' Hyderabad.
3. The Secretary Regional Transport Authority, South Zone, Bahadurpura, Hyderabad
4. One CC to t\//s. B. Geeta, Advocate (OPUC)
5. Two CCs to GP for Transport, High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad (OUT)
6. Two CD Copies.
PIV \.
HIGH COURT DATED:1510912020 rA 18SEP2u[ (.) a * D s p c
ORDER
WP.No.14950 of 2020 DISPOSING OF THE WP WITHOUT COSTS \8