← Library
High Court for State of TelanganaWP/10644/2018dismissed as infructuous

M. Chander v. The Director Of Employment And Training,

2023-03-15E.V. Venugopal3 pages

[ 32s9 ] HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY ,THE FIFTEENTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENry THREE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE E.V. VENUGOPAL wRtT PETITION NO: 10544 OF 2018 Between:

M. CHANDER, S/o M. Janakudu, Aged about 52 Years, Occ. Training Officer (TO), O/o Government lTl Warangal, Warangal District, TS. ...'ETITIONER AND 1 . The Director of Employment and Training, Telangana State, Hyderabad.

2. The State of Telangana, represented by its Principal Secretary, Labour, Employment, Training and Factories Department, Secretariat Buildings, HYderabad'

...RE.P.NDENT'

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may \be pleased to issue, a Writ, Order or Orders more particularly one in the nature Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents not to effect promotions to the post of Principal of lTl colleges as per seniority list dated 27.04.2017 and further not including the petitioner'name in the seniority list of Training Officers of multi zone-lll, though he got promoted on 1 3.05.

2015 as Training Officer and consequently direct the respondents to include the name of the petitioner in the seniority list and consider his case for promotion to the post of Principal, lTl colleges with all consequential benefits, by holding the action of the respondents in effecting promotions to the post of Principal, lTl colleges by following the seniority list of the candidates who were promoted upto January, 2014 only and further riot including the candidates who are subsequently promoted like the petitioner to the post of Training Officer by preparing the seniority list including all the candidates who are working as Training officers till date is as illegal, arbitrary, discriminatory and subversive of Articles 14,16 of the Constitution of lndia lA NO: 1 OF 2018 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents not to effect promotions to the post of Principal of lTl colleges as per the seniority list dated 27.

04.2017 or alternatively to reserve one post of Principal, lTl college in multi zone-lll Counsel for the Petitioner: SRl. CH.

HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE E.V.VENUGOPAL '!

i WRIT PETITION No. 1O644 of 2OLB ORDER:

Learned counsel for the petitioner, fairlv submits that the subject matter of the writ petition has become infructuous and requests for dismissal.

2.

In view of the above submission, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to CoStS.

3.

Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this writ petition, shall also stand dismissed.

SD'. K. ATUMAJI ASSISTANT REGISTR4B /,TRUE COPY'/ SECTI FFICER to', Two CCs to GP FOR EMPLOYMENT TRAINING 'High Court for the State of , e*Stela tHlt"'11tff.t3,VJlrHA RAo' Advocate toPucl

3. Two CD coPies BM^ CrPfP

HIGH COURT DATED:1510312023 1i",i S i,i >(.

'. 1:l (-)

ORDER

2 7 APf 21120 ' i WP.No.1064/. ot 2018 \.

'. 1,,. . , DISMTSSING THE WRIT PETITION AS INFRUCTUOUS WITHOUT COSTS d5 @ ..*".

n4Ar1 \.n\v;