Mubashar Ahmed Tariq v. Nusrath Jahan
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA
AT HYDERABAD WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY TWO PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE A.VENKATESHWARA REDDY CIVIL REVISION PETITION N O:2122 OF 2018 Petition filed under Artrcle 227 of the Constitution of lndia, aggrieved by the order dt. 23-01-2018, passed in LA.No.71 of 2018 in OP.No.449 of 2015, on the file of the Court of the Principal Judge, Family Court, City Civil Court at Hyderabad. Between:
Ivlubashar Ahmed Tariq, S/o. Haji Manzoor Ahmad Darvesh, Aged about. 48 years, Occ. General Store Business, Rlio. Ir/ohalla Ahmadiyya Qadian, District Gurdaspur, Pun.jab ...PETITIONER/RESPONDENT AND Nusrath Jahan, D/o. Sultanuddin Fazil, Aged About.4O Years, Occ. House Hold, Ryo. 18-1-350/1 1/25, Ayesha Colony, Kanchanbagh, Chandrayangufia, Hyderabad-59 ...RESPONDENT/PETITIONER Counsel for the Petitioner : SRI. SHAIK SHAKEEL AHMED Counsel for the Respondents : NONE APPEARED The Court made the following :ORDER
HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE A. VENKATESHWARA REDDY CML REVISION PETITION No.2122 oF 2018 ORDER:
There is no representation for the respondent. 2.
This Civil Revision Petition is filed assailing the orders in I.A.No.71 of 2018 in O.P.No.449 of 2015 on the file of the learned Principal Judge, Family Court, Civil Civil Court at Hyderabad, dated 23.01.2018, whereas, as per the case status information, the said Original Petition was allowed on contest on 14.06.2019.
3.
Accordingly, as no cause survives, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as infructLlous. There shall be no order as to costs. Miscellaneous Petitions, if any, pending in this Civil Revision Petition shall stand closcd.
SD/.T,KRISHNA KUMAR ASSISTANT REGISTRAR ,TRUE COPY'
CN \ SECTION OFFICER To, '1 . The Principal Judge, Family Court, City Civil Court at Hyderabad
2. One CC to Sri Shaik Shakeel Ahmed, Advocate [OPUC]
3. Two CD CoPies
4. One SPare CoPY Pcsd gbr '.\
HIGH COURT DATED: 2310212022 1 'dE SrA r(:
( r'l q ( ,., )l -t
ORDER
j ab MAR zo22 !
CRP.No.2122 of 2018 DISMISSING THE CIVIL REVISION PETITION AS INFRUCTUOUS @ .t)'