K. Anitha v. The Government Of Andhra Pradesh Rep. By Its Principal

[ 325s ] HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD MONDAY, THE SECOND DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE N.V.SHRAVAN KUMAR WRIT PETITION TRANSFERED NO: 976 OF 2017 Between:

K. Anitha, Wo. K. David George, Aged about 40 years, Occ: Unemployee, Rl/o. Flat No. 102, Venkateshwara Apartments, Bramarambica Nagar, Malkagiri, Hyderabad.

..,APPLICANT AND 1 . The Government of Andhra Pradesh rep. by its Principal Secretary, Municipal Administration and Urban Development Department, A.P., Secretariat, Hyderabad.

2. The Secretary, A.P. Public Service Commission, Nampally, Hyderabad. ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to declare the action of the respondents in not considering the case of the applicant for appointment to the posts of Senior Accounts Category, Accounts officer Cate.l or Junior Accounts officer Category ll as illegal, arbitrary, unreasonable and violation of Principles of natural justice and consequently direct the respondents to appoint the applicant as Senior Accounts Category/Accounts officer Category/Junior Accounts officer Category-ll and Senior Accounts officer Category-lll in pursuance to the Notification No.7/2012 issued by the APPSC on 8.2.2012.

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI R. SATYANARAYANA MURTHY Counsel forthe Respondents: GP FOR SERVICES The Court made the following: ORDER

HONOURAITLE SRI IUS'rrCE N.V.SHRAVAN KUMAR WITIT I'ETITION (TR) No.976 OF 2017 ORDER:

Today when the matter has been taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that due to efflux of time, the cause in the writ petition (TR) does not survive for further adjudication and the Iearned Government Pleader appearing for respondents has fairly acceded the same. 2.

Recording the above submission of the counsel appearing on either side, the Writ Petition (-fR) is dismissed as infructuous. 3.

Miscellaneous applications. if any pending, shall stand closed. No order as to cost.

I \ SD/- K. VENKAIAH //TRUE copy// ASSISTANT REGIEIRAR sEcfloN of,FrcER To,

1. One CC to SRI R. SAryANARAYANA MURTHY, Advocate [OPUC]

2. Two CCs to GP FOR SERVICES, High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad [OUTI

3. Two CD Copies BB GJP 41ur-

HIGH COURT DATED: 02101t2023 I

ORDER

W.P (TR).No.976 of 2017 'riE Sa4 ( ,J iJ 2 B ,JAli zul rt DrsMrssrNc THE WR|T PETITION (TR) AS INFRUCTUOUS WITHOUT COSTS 2:'

?.o