← Library
High Court for State of TelanganaSA/1025/2000dismissed as non prosecution

A.Prakash And 2 Others v. Muncipal Commissioner Hyd And Another

2022-04-19M.Laxman3 pages

HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD TUESDAY, THE NINETEENTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTYTWO PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE M.LAXMAN SECOND APPEAL NO: 1025 OF 2000 Appeal under Section '100 of CPC against the judgment and decree made in AS No.7 of 96 dated 2310812000 on the file of the Court of the lll Member Tribunal for Disciplinary Proceedings -cum- Vlll Additional Chief Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad preferred against the judgment and decree in OS No.442 of 94 dated 1711111995 on the file of the Court of the ll Assistant Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad.

Between:

Prakash, S/o.Kumaraiah, R/o.19-3-789, Aliabad, Hyderabad. Nagesh, S/o.Kumaraiah, R/o. 1 9-3-789, Aliabad, Hyderabad. Ashok, S/o.Kumaraiah, Ryo. 19-3-789, Aliabad, Hyderabad. 2.4 3.A ,..APPELLANTS/ APPELLANTS/ PLAILNTIFFS AND A,4unicipal Corporation of Hyderabad rep. by its Commissioner & Special Officer, IMunicipal Comptex, Tank Bund Road, Hyderabad. tr,4/s. Shiva Shakti Apartmdnts, a partnership firm, rep. by It4.Chandraiah, S/o.Sayanna, No.2-1-52711 , New Nallakunta, Hyderabad. (R2 not necessary in this SA) ...RESPONDENTS/ RESPONDENTS/ DEFENDANTS For the Appellants : SRI M.V.S.SURESH KUMAR, Advocate Forthe Respondents: SRI RAMA RAO G., Advocate The Court delivered the following: JUDGIVENT

./ THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE M. LAXMAN SECOND APPEAL NO.1O25 OF 2OOO JUDGMENT:

This Second Appeal is filed against the judgment and decree dated 23.08.2000 in A.S.No.O7 of 1996 on the file of the Court of the III Member Tribunal for Disciplinary Proceedings-cum-VIII Additional Chief Judge, City Civil Court, Hvderabad.

Learned counsel for appellants No. 1 and 3 filed a Memo stating that he has no instructions from appellants No l and 3. He also stated that appellant No.2 died, but no further instructions regarding Legal Representatives. This appeal is of the year 2000. There is no interest shor,vn by the parties. Hence, the Second Appeal is dismissed lor nonprosecution. J As a sequel, pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand closed.

Sd/-K.SRINIVASA RAO JOINT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPYII &4SECTION OFFICER To

1. The lll Member Tribunal for Disciplinary Proceedings -cum- Vlll Additional Chief Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad.

2. The ll Assistant Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad.

3. One CC to Sri M.V.S.Suresh Kumar, Advocate (OPUC)

4. One CC to Sri Rama Rao G., Advocate (OPUC)

5. Two CD Copies

6. One Spare Copy Kj.n {

HIGH COURT DATED:1910412022 14 ,6 oe ( o o() ii !lI 11 JUL 232 // * FA-i C

JUDGMENT

SA.No.1025 of 2000 DISMISSED FOR NON.PROSECUTION,