D.Andalamma v. The State Of Telangana

HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE U.DURGA PRASAD RAO I.A. No.2 of 2018 in Crl.P.No. 3898 of 2018 And CRIMINAL PETITION No.3898 of 2018 COMMON ORDER:

The de-facto complainant and her counsel Sri M. Roopender are present. Accused No. 1 and her counsel Sri Pottigari Sridhar Reddy are present.

Heard both sides and perused the petition.

The de-facto complainant lodged FIR No. 231 of 2012 with Medchal Police against the accused for the offences under Sections 420 & 468 IPC and Section 3 (1) (iv) of The Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 (for short "the Act") and investigation is stated to be pending. It is submitted that at the intervention of elders, parties have settled the matter in respect of offences under Sections 420 & 468 IPC and Section 3 (1) (iv) of the Act, and entered into a compromise and hence the compromise may be recorded and proceedings may be quashed in the interest of justice. Having regard to the above said submission and considering the fact that the parties have amicably settled the disputes among themselves, and no purpose will be served even if the parties are driven to trial and following the decision reported in Gian Singh Vs. State of Punjab and another1, the I.A. No. 2 is allowed and compromise is recorded and consequently the proceedings in S.C.No. 107 of 2016 on the file of Special Sessions Judge for Trial of SC & 1 (2012) 10 SCC 303

ST (POA) cum VII Additional District and Sessions Judge, R.R. District, L.B.Nagar are quashed.

In the result, both the petitions are accordingly disposed of. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, pending if any, shall stand closed. _________________________ U.DURGA PRASAD RAO, J Date: 12.04.2018 KA