← Library
High Court for State of TelanganaAS/774/2008dismissed as non prosecution

T. Narayana Murthy v. Government Of Andhra Pradesh

2023-08-24P.Sree Sudha3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA

AT HYDERABAD THURSDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE P.SREE SUDHA APPEAL SUIT NO: 774 OF 2008 Appeal Under Order 41 Rule 1 Read with Section 96 of C.P.C. Preferred against the Judgment and Decree dated 25-06-2007 made in O.S.l"lo. 202 of 2006 on the file of the Court of the ll Additional District Judge, Ranga Reddy District at L.B.Nagar, Hyderabad.

Between:

T. Narayana Murthy, S/o. T. Nerella, Vijayanagar Colony, Hyderabad.

Occ- Business, R/o. 10-3-761/B, ...AppellanUPlaintiff No.1 AND

1. Government of Andhra Pradesh, Represented by its Secretary, Revenue Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad.

2. The Joint Collector, Ranga Reddy District,, Office at Lakdikapool' Hyderabad.

3. The Rerenue Divisional Officer,, Chella Division, Office at Domalguda, Hyderabad.

4. The Deputy Collector and Mandal Revenue Officer,, Serilingampally Mandal.

5. A.P. Billiards and Snookers Association, Represented by its President, L.B. Stadium, Fateh Maidan, Hyderabad.

(RR 1 , 3 &5 dismissed for default vide court order dated 25-0'l-2016) ...ResPondents/Defendants

6. Sri T.V. Ramana Murthy, S/o. Sri T.Nerulu, Occ- Bank Employee, R/o. 10-3761/8, Vijayanagar Colony, Hyderabad. (R-6 is Proforma Respondent , no Relief is Claimed) ...RespondenUPlaintiff Counsel for the Appellant: SRI G. RAMA GOPAL Counsel for the Respondents: --- The Court made the following: ORDER

THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE P.SREE SUDHA APPEAL STIIT No.774 of 2fi)8 ORDER:

This Appeal Suit is filed by the appellant, aggrieved by the order in O.S.No.2O2 of 2006 dated 25.06.2007 on the file of II Additional District Judge, Ranga Reddy district, NTR Nagar, Hyderabad.

2.

lrarned counsel for the appellant is absent today and also on LO.OL.2O23 and O3.O8.2023, hence the matter is listed under the caption for dismissal'.

3.

Inspite of listing the matter under the caption for dismissal the appellant did not turn up. Hence no purpose would be served in continuing the appeal pending. 4.

Accordingly, the appeal suit is dismissed for non prosecution.

Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand closed.

sd/- K. sAtLEsHr DEPUW REG STRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION FICER To,

1. The ll Additional District Judge, Ranga Reddy District at L.B.Nagar, Hyderabad

2. One CC to SRl. c. RAMA GOPAL, Advocate IOPUCI

3. Two CD Copies (@PSR

HIGH COURT DATED:24IOB|2O23 IT€ Sr o -l* tr foo Jh\ 1\1\ .I oEST t r.{'

ORDER

AS.No.774 ot 2008 DISMISSING THE APPEAL SUIT FOR NON.PROSECUTION WITHOUT COSTS (.

6\'0, Gw'