G. Chandra Sekhar, v. G.Swapna, And Another,

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR

or, "orJ*.o?rfl E o F rE LA N G ANA THURSDAYJHE TWENTY^EIGHTH DAY OF OCTOBER Two rHousAND AND rwtllri o..trti"'""

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE G.RADHA RANI RIMIN AL REVI roN CAS E NO:1 248 OF criminar Revision case fired Under Sections 3g7 and 401 0f cr.p.c aggrieved by the order made in M.c.No.204 0f 2005, dated. 30-04-2007, on the fire of the court of the Additionar Metroporitan sessions Judge for the triar of Jubiree Hirs car Bomb Blast Court-cum-Additional Family Court, Hyderabad. Between G. Chandra Sekhar. Aoed 32. years_, Chartered Accountant, .,o. 8_3-22916121, Venkatagiri, Road No. iO, LuOitde nirri,-iyA;r;I;;."*'

...Petitioner/Respondent

AND 1 G,S-w9p1q, W/o. G. Chandrasekhar, Aged 24 years, Occ. Housewife, Rl/o. H.No. 1 1 -2-87 5126, Nampally, Hyderabad.

2. The State of Andhra Pradesh, represented by its public prosecutor, High Court of Andhra Pradesh, at Hyderabad.

...Respondents

Counsel for the Petitioner: M/s G. VASANTHA RAYUDU Counsel for the Respondent No.1: NONE APPEARED Counsel for the Respondent No.2: THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR The Court made the following: ORDER

HON,BLE DT.JUSTICE G.RADHA RANI L2480F NAL s c 20,07 ION E No.

ORDER:

Learned counsel for petitioner submitted that the matter was settied between the parties before the trial Courtandassuchthiscriminalpetitionhasbecome infructuous.

Record,ing the said submission' this Criminal Petition is dismissed as infructuous'

MiscellaneousPetitions,ifany,pendingshallstand closed.

Sd/-CH. VENKATESWARLU ASSISTANT REGISTRAR I //TRUE COPY// t SECTION OFFICER To, The Additional N,4etropolitan Sessions Judge for the trial of Jubilee Hills Car Bomb Blast Court-cum-Additio*iiurnirv 6ourt, Hyderabad (with records if any) ;;;bC;i" the Public Prosecutor, HighCourtforthe State of Telangana' at Z Hyderabad [OUT] oi," c-C t" M/s G Vasantha Rayudu, Advocate [OPUC] Two CD CoPies MMK t\s

l, HIGH COURT DATED:28/10/2021

ORDER

CRLRC.No.1248 of 2007 e .\ /"a FIii EC q d o7D 2c t D6.9p,^'ii'

DISMISSING THE CRIMINAL REVISION CASE AS INFRUCTUOUS ( \