Boddapati Venkata Rani W/O.B.Nageswarao, Rayanapadu, v. The State Of Andhra Pradesh

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE A. RAJASHEKER REDDY WRIT PETITION No.4866 of 2015 Between:

Boddapati Venkata Rani PETITIONER AND

1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, rep. by its Principal Secretary, Panchayat Raj Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad and others. RESPONDENTS

ORDER:

This writ is filed challenging the action of the respondents in not taking action on the representation of the petitioner dated 30.12.2014 and 23.02.2015 for taking steps to stop the illegal construction of group houses in Sy.No.49 Ravayanapadu village Vijayawada Rural, Krishna District, as illegal and arbitrary and consequently to direct the respondents to take steps to stop the illegal construction of group houses.

The case of the petitioner is that he is the owner of building D.No.5-105 of Rayanapadu village. The unofficial respondents started construction of group of houses in R.S.No.49, in the western side of his house without obtaining any permission for construction violating the norms prescribed in the statute. It is his grievance that though he has submitted representations dated 30.12.2104 and 23.02.2015 to the respondents no action has been taken so far. Hence he filed the present writ petition.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Government Pleader for Revenue (A.P) for respondents 1 & 3, Sri Ravi Cheemalapati, learned Standing Counsel appearing for respondent No.2, Smt. Mani Deepika, learned Standing Counsel for respondent No.8.

Learned Standing Counsel for respondent No.8 submits that the 8th respondent has not received any representation, but only a copy is marked.

The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner will file a fresh representation before the 8th respondent. In view of the same, the writ petition is disposed of permitting the petitioner to file a fresh representation before the 8th respondent

and on such representation being made, the 8th respondent shall consider and dispose of the same in accordance with law, as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, after giving opportunity of being heard to all the stake holders. No costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. ____________________________ A. RAJASHEKER REDDY, J.

10th March, 2015 Js.