Shaik Rabbani v. The State Of Telangana,

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA

AT HYDERABAD THE HONOURABLE SMT. JUSTICE K. SUJANA CRIMINAL PETITION No.5750 of 2026 DATE: 21.04.2026 BETWEEN:

Shaik Rabbani and others.

..... Petitioners/A.30, 33, 41 and 42 And The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Public Prosecutor, High Court at Hyderabad Through the Station House Officer, P.S. Banswada Town, Kamareddy District.

..... Respondent/Complainant

ORDER

This Criminal Petition is filed under Section 482 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for short 'BNSS') for grant of prearrest bail to the petitioners, who are arrayed as accused Nos. 30, 33, 41 and 42 in Crime No.49 of 2026 before the Banswada Town Police Station, Kamareddy District, registered for the offences

punishable under Sections 191(1), 191(2), 191(3), 196(1)(a), 109, read with 190 of BNS.

2.

The brief facts of the case are that, the de facto complainant lodged a report before the police on 21.02.2026, stating that on 20.02.2026 at about 19:30 hrs at Rajiv Chowk, Banswada, two communal groups formed unlawful assemblies and engaged in violent clashes. When police attempted to control the situation, both groups pelted stones with intent to cause death, resulting in injuries to the complainant and other police personnel. Hence, requested the police to take necessary action. Based on this report, the police registered a case against the accused for the above-mentioned offences.

3.

Heard Sri Mohd. Moin Ahmed Quadri, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners, and Sri M. Rama Chandra Reddy, learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing on behalf of the respondent-State.

4.

Learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the petitioners are innocent of the said allegations and have been falsely implicated, and that they were not identified by the de facto complainant. He further submitted that, for the very same

incident, the police registered multiple FIRs bearing Nos.48, 53, 54, 55, 65 and 71 which amounts to double jeopardy, and that in view of the settled principles of law, several crimes cannot be registered for the same incident based on multiple complaints from different de facto complainants. He further contended that the other accused have already been granted bail, and that the petitioners are ready and willing to cooperate with the investigation. Hence, he prayed this Court to grant pre‐arrest bail to the petitioners by allowing the present Criminal Petition. 5.

On the other hand, learned Additional Public Prosecutor opposed the submissions, contending that the allegations against the petitioners are severe and grave in nature, as they not only attempted to kill or murder but also caused severe damage to the de-facto complainant. He further submitted that the investigation is at a nascent stage and that custodial interrogation of the petitioners is necessary for effective investigation. Accordingly, he prayed for dismissal of the Criminal Petition. 6.

In light of the submissions made by both learned counsel and upon perusal of the material available on record, it appears that the allegation against the petitioners is that they pelted stones at the de-facto complainant, resulting in severe injuries to him. It

is the specific contention of the petitioners that multiple FIRs have been registered in relation to the same incident. As seen from the complaint, and there are no specific allegations to the petitioners as alleged in the complaint. The record further indicates that the petitioners have not been identified by the de facto complainant, and that several co‐accused have already been granted bail. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case and the nature of the allegations, this Court deems it fit to grant pre-arrest bail to the petitioners, subject to the following conditions: i.

The petitioners shall surrender before the Station House Officer, Banswada Town Police Station, Kamareddy District within two weeks from today, and on such surrender, the said Station House Officer shall release them on bail on executing a personal bond for Rs.25,000/- each with two sureties, for the like sum each.

ii.

The petitioners shall abide by the other conditions stipulated in Section 482(2) of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 and co-operate with the Investigating Officer in investigating the case.

iii.

The petitioners shall appear before the concerned Investigating Officer on every Wednesday between 09:00 a.m, and 05:00 p.m. for a period of eight (8) weeks or till filing of charge sheet whichever is earlier, for the purpose of investigation, and thereafter, as and when required.

7.

Accordingly, this Criminal Petition is allowed. Miscellaneous applications, if any pending, shall stand closed.

_______________ K. SUJANA, J Date: 21.04.2026 SRK

THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE K. SUJANA CRIMINAL PETITION No.5750 of 2026 Date: 21.04.2026 SRK