A.Venugopalan Nair, v. Shri K.Balachandran, Asst.Commandant / Enquiry Officer,
t [3413] HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD l THURSDAY, THE NINETEENTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE LAXMI NARAYANA ALISHETTY WRIT APPEAL NO: 952 OF 2004 Wdt Appeal under clause 15 of the Letters Patent against the judgment in WP No.1 1261 of 1998, dt. 24-03-2004 on the file of the High Court. Between:
A.Venugopalan Nair, S/o. Appan Nair, Aged 47 years, Occ: Lance Naik, Centrallndustrial Security Force, NTPC (R), Ramagundam, Karimnagar Dist. I ...APPELLANT AND Shri K.Balachandran, Asst.Commandant / Enquiry officer, CISF Unit, BSTPS/NTPC(R), Ramagundam, PO.Jyothinagar, Karimnagar Dist. The Commandant CISF Unit, NTPC (R), Ramagudam, Karimnagar Dist. The Deputy lnspector General, CISF, Southern Zone Hrs, Rajaji Bhavan, Besant Nagar, D-Block, Madras-90- ...RESPONDENTS Counsel for the Appellant: M/s. SUNKARA SRIOEVI (NoT PRESENT) Counsel forthe Respondents: SRI GADI PRAVEEN KUMAR, DEPUTY SOLTCITOR GENERIAL OF INDIA The Court made the following: JUDGMENT
/'
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE LAXMI NARAYANA ALISHETTY U/RIT APPEAL No.952 0F 20()4 JUDGMENT i @er the Hon'ble Sri Justice Abhinand Kumar Stntiti) '
None appeared for the appellant, though the Writ Appeal is listed today under the caption .for dismissal,. Hence, this Court has no other option, except to dismiss the Writ Appeal for default and also for nonprosecution.
2. Accordingly, the Writ Appeat 1S dismissed for default as well as for non-prosecution. No costs. 3.
As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending if any in this Writ Appeal, shall stand closed. SD/- B. SATYAVATHI DEPUTY REGISTRAR -.-.
.
//TRUE COPY// R To,
1. One CC to M/s. SUNKARA SRIDEVI, Advocate [OPUC]
2. One CC to SRI GADI PRAVEEN KUMAR, DEPUTY SOLICITOR GENERIAL OF lNDIA, High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad IOPUC]
3. Two CD Copies BSR K l
HIGH COURT DATED: 1911212024 fA :s r o , 1 3 FEB 2025
JUDGMENT
Y,, \n WA.No.952 of 2004 g-o * /)E.spa-rc$ DISMISSING THE WRIT APPEAL FOR DEFAULT AS WELL AS FOR NON-PROSECUTION, WITHOUT COSTS .nP@k, f)