M/S. T. Gangaiah And Company, Hyderabad v. The State Of A.P., Rep By State Representatives, Hyderabad

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR. THE STATE OF TELANGANA

AT HYDERABAD MONDAY,THE EIGHTH DAY OF DECEMBER T\A/O THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE P.SAM KOSHY AND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUDDALA CHALAPATHI RAO Tax Revision Under Section 22 (1) of the APGST Act, 1957 against the order dated 07-09-2009 in T.A.No. 321 of 2006 on the file of the Sales Tax Appellate Tribunal, Andhra Pradesh, Hyderabad Between:

M/s. R. Gangaiah and Company, Ameerpet, Hyderabad ...PETITIONER AND The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its State Representatives Beforethe Sales ili AppEUaie TriOrnaiOpp. Gan,ini 6havan, Namfally A.P., Hyderabad ...RESPONDENT Counsel for the Petitioner: SRl. B. SRINIVAS Counsel for the Respondent: NONE APPEARED The Court made the following ORDER:

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA

AT HYDERABAD THT}HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE P.SAM KOSHY AND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUDDALA CHALAPATHI RAO ( t T.RC.No.78 OF 2010 Dated: 08.12.2025 Between:

IWs.Gangrliah & Company, Ameerpet, Hyderabad.

. . . Petitioner AND The State r:f Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by th,e State Representative, Before the Sales Tax Appellate Tribunal, Opp.Gandri Bhavan, Nampally, Hyderabad..

...Respondent

ORDER: (cer lTon'ble Sri Justice P.Sam Kosh.y) Today, when the matter is taken up {br hearing, Mr.B.Srinivas, leamed counse[ for the petitioner, on instructions, submits that he is not pressing on the present l'ax Revision Case. 2.

Accc'rdingly, the Tax Revision Case stands dismissed as not pressed. There shall be no order as to costs.

1l Consequently, miscellaneous petitions pending,'if any, shall stand closed.

SD'. N SRIHARI //TRUE COPY// OFFICER To,

1. The Sales Tax Appellate Tribunal' A-P-, Hyderabad &

2. One CC to SRl. B. SRINIVAS, Advocate [OPUC] r 3. Two CD CoPies kul/PSL )

\ HIGH COURI'

) DATED:08l,1?2025

ORDER

TREVC.No.78 o12010 DISMISSING T]fr TAX REVISION CASE AS NOT PRESSED WITHOUT COSTS a *,'

e