← Library
High Court for State of TelanganaCRLP/16954/2016dismissed as infructuous

G.Venkat Rao v. The State Of Telangana.,Rep.,Pp And Another

2022-06-30D.Nagarjun3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA

AT HYDERABAD THURSDAY, THE THIRIIETH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY TWO PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE D.NAGARJUN CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 16954 OF 20't6 Between:

G.Venkat Rao, S/o Late G.V. Subba Rao, aged about 59 years, Occ: Business, Rt/o.Flat No.5, Sun Rise Apartments, Naveen Nagar, Khairatabad, Hyderabad ...PETITIONER/ACCUSED AND I

1. The State of Telangana, Rep. By its Public Prosecutor, High Court of Judicature at Hyderabad.

2. M/s S.R.R. Mutually, Aided Co-op Society Ltd., Rep. By its M.D. Umesh Kumar Waghray, S/o N.N. Waggray, Aged about 59 years, Occ: Business, R/o H.No.'l-2-330, Domalguda, Hyderabad ...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT I Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to call for the records and quash the orders Dt.05-12-2016 passed in Criminal M.P. No.1594 of 2016 in C.C.No"260 of 2015 on the file of the court of V Special Magistrate, Hyderabad.

l.A. NO: 1 OF 2016(CRLPMP. NO: 19113 OF 2016) Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay all further proceedings in C.C.No.260 of 2015 on the file of the court of V Special Magistrate, Hyderabad I l This Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of Sri Prasad Rao, Advocate for Sri K.RATNA SAGAR, Advocate for the Petitioner and the Public Prosecutor (TG) on behalf of the Respondent No.1 and of Sri V.Amar Kumar, Advocate for the Respondent No.2.

The Court made the following: ORDER

THE HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE D.NAGARJUN CRIMINAL PETITION No. 16954 of2016 ORDER:

Mr.Prasad Rao, learned counsel representing Mr.K.Ratna Sagar, learned counsel for the petitioner on record, has submitted that the criminal petition has become infructuous. 2.

In view of the above submission, the Criminal Petition is dismissed as infructuous.

As a sequel, pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand closed.

Sd/.K.SAILESHI DEPUTY REGI R //TRUE COPYII SECTION OFFICER To

1. The V Special Magistrate, Hyderabad.

2. One CC to Sri K.Ratna Sagar, Advocate (OPUC)

3. One CC to Sri V.Amar Kumar, Advocate (OPUC)

4. Two CCs to the Public Prosecutor, High Court for the State of Telangana, Hyderabad (OUT)

5. Two CD Copies

6. One Spare Copy Kj.

%

HIGH COURT DATED:30/06/2022 I ,4 (e- (ne srei ( 2 7 StP ?trIz Pzo

ORDER

CRLP.No.16954 of 2016 CRL.P. DISMISSED AS INFRUCTUOUS.

\